
Nationals leader David Littleproud made a bombshell threat to quit the frontbench along with all of his party’s shadow ministers if Opposition Leader Sussan Ley accepted the resignations of three rebel Nationals, which she did, leaving the Coalition agreement hanging by a thread.
This masthead has obtained a letter sent by Littleproud to Ley on Wednesday morning saying that Ley had the right to sack frontbenchers Bridget McKenzie, Susan McDonald and Ross Cadell after they broke from the Liberals to vote against the government’s bill to crackdown on hate groups.
But, Littleproud argued in the letter, Ley should avoid doing so because the legislative process was so rushed and the shadow cabinet never signed off on a final bill – a claim heavily contested by the Liberals.
“If these resignations are accepted, the entire National Party ministry will resign to take collective responsibility,” Littleproud wrote in a hand-signed letter sent to Ley.
“Opposing this bill was a party room decision. The entire National Party shadow ministry is equally bound”.
Hours after Littleproud’s letter, Ley accepted the resignations with the full backing of right-wing Liberal powerbrokers such as Michaelia Cash, James Paterson and Jonno Duniam.
Nationals MPs were meeting at 6pm on Wednesday to decide whether to carry out the threat.
After spending weeks piling pressure on Labor over its flat-footed response to the Bondi massacre, a torturous few days of sparring over hate speech laws pulled apart the Coalition and plunged it into a fresh crisis as One Nation pulls support from its right flank.
The joint Liberal-National shadow cabinet on Sunday made an in-principle agreement to back Labor’s crackdown on hate groups so long as they were amended in line with Coalition demands, which they were.
That agreement started to fall apart on Monday when Nationals backbencher Matt Canavan, who has often set the agenda inside the junior Coalition partner, started to campaign against the bill over concerns it would target mainstream religious and political groups.
After the frontbenchers voted against the hate speech laws, they sent resignation letters to Ley on Wednesday morning, as first reported by this masthead, in acknowledgement that they had breached convention as shadow ministers to toe the party line.
Ley repeatedly told Littleproud about the need for his MPs to stick with the agreed position before the vote, Liberal sources speaking on the condition of anonymity said.
But Ley, under pressure to prove that she could enforce discipline, said she had accepted the resignations hours later on Wednesday afternoon, saying, “Shadow cabinet solidarity is not optional.”
“It is the foundation of serious opposition and credible government.”
“I made it clear to David Littleproud that members of the shadow cabinet could not vote against the shadow cabinet position. The shadow cabinet was unanimous in its endorsement to support this bill subject to several amendments that we did then secure.”
One top Liberal said: “Littleproud is threatening to pull the Nationals out of the frontbench at the same time as saying in private that he hopes the Coalition can stay together. It’s a nonsensical position.”
Flailing in the polls, Ley took the decision to let the frontbenchers go with the full backing of right-wing Liberal powerbrokers such as Michaelia Cash, James Paterson and Jonno Duniam. Duniam and Ley convinced right-wing Liberals such as Andrew Hastie to back the hate crimes bill that made visa cancellations easier and allowed for the prohibition of hate groups such as neo-Nazis and radical Islamists.
Even Ley’s critics in the Liberal Party backed her stance against the Nationals on Wednesday as they expressed private fury at Littleproud for failing to bring his party into a coherent position on the laws.
But the long-run implication for Ley might still be devastating if the wounds caused by the resignations, or an even more damaging Coalition split, erode Ley’s standing further and fuel a leadership challenge from Hastie or Angus Taylor, who missed the parliamentary week as he was on holiday in Europe.
One Liberal made the point that several inner-city Liberal frontbenchers wanted to vote for Labor’s gun restrictions but voted against the laws in line with Coalition policy, an example the Nationals could not emulate against the backdrop of a backlash among online free speech advocates.
The scale of the libertarian/far-right discontent towards Labor’s policies was evident on the social media feed of right-wing darling Andrew Hastie, whose posts were flooded with messages urging a vote for One Nation, which opposed the laws.
Nationals frontbencher Anne Webster said of a split on Wednesday: “We are not afraid to do it again.”
Foreign Minister Penny Wong seized on the tension to create a leadership test for Ley.
“A very important question now is there for Sussan Ley. The shadow cabinet made a decision to support this legislation, but shadow cabinet members have voted against it. Will she enforce the convention that people, shadow cabinet members, who vote against the shadow cabinet position have to resign, or will she squib it?” Wong said.
Source: Expensive-Horse5538
18 Comments
This will be the biggest own goal in political history for australia
Ley bitched and moaned for albo to do something,he does it..then it backfires because the partys still full of cookers..
got to laugh at it.
This is completely self inflicted,if she had of just shut the fuck up and not politicized dead ppl they wouldn’t be in this mess
The move here is for the Libs and Labor right to form a coalition.
They need to stop pretending they’re not the same thing.
When did politicians become so school yard drama ?
I assume this is what happens when all the normal people leave a political party
Always with the threats.
My understanding is the three Nats that ignored cabinet solidarity have all resigned. They have acted with integrity.
Littleproud has not.
Littleproud is a little man.
They’re playing this like amateurs. Given their current ambitions, instead of offering resignations then making threats around their acceptable, they should’ve made Ley sack them. This looks shambolic.
I’ll never understand why people watch reality TV shows like Real Housewives or MAFS when they could tune into Australian politics and see real-life clueless, self-indulgent bitches like the LNP.
The Coalition inserted the wedge the wrong way, pulled it out to look closer and poked themselves in their collective eye, put it back in the wrong way, and then fell over their own feet when they stood up.
Liberals of years past must be spinning in their grave at the sheer incompetence of the modern Liberal party.
Can anyone tell me what the Nationals have ACTUALLY done for Australia, aside from keeping us from progressing forward as a country?
On a broader level, I’m in Queensland and it’s pretty damn clear that the “N” of the merged LNP are wearing the pants in state parliament. FFS.
Imagine being given a free kick against the government but instead continually whack yourself in the shins. The Coalition are continuing to prove that they’re just a nasty party, devoid of merit, talent and have zero idea how to run themselves let alone ready to run the country.
Don’t threaten me with a good time…
I would just go through with it if I were Ley and let the Nats come crawling back a few weeks later. Nats may be thinking they could do better with a One Nation coalition but whether they like it or not the Liberals have a much more enduring brand and legacy than PHON ever will, this election or any thereafter.
I mean the Nationals should be given some latitude to break cabinet ranks given they are in a separate party and have their own party room
Can they just let the Nationals resign? In the past 20 years, I can’t think of a single positive thing the Nationals have added to the broader political discourse; if anything, they protect the most extreme views and actions within the Federal government.
The Liberals have things I disagree with, but that’s politics; they still function as a net positive, though it is so hard to hold to claim during the Abbott era.
The Nationals seem to do nothing but drag the Liberals down on every issue; rather than discuss things rationally and try to find a compromise, they always try to hold the broader Coalition hostage with hardline, black-and-white positions, and individual National members constantly get into idiotic personal scandals that reflects back upon the Coalition as a whole.
will the nationals ever get tired of threatening us with good news
John Howard would be spinning in his grave at this mess
Way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
Genuinely what is stopping One Nation from replacing the Nationals and the Nats just dying. Coalition then being between Liberals and ON? The polling cannot be ignored and ON definitely is more popular with the Nats voter base.
> because the legislative process was so rushed
Ley wanted to recall parliament BEFORE CHRiSTMAS.
This is /r/LeopardsAteMyFace stuff. Tony Burke was calling Barnaby the “Leader of the Opposition” hahaha.
Why did Dave not just tell his boofheads to rescind their resignations?