Glad to see government challenging the really tough issues facing society today
PomeloTraditional971 on
Damn it, I’m going to have to delete all the step family pornos I have filling my 40TB NAS now 😥
SkirtComfortable952 on
Would rather they dealt with the stupid high cost of living…….
NotoriousP_U_G on
So, you can marry and have children with your cousin, but you can’t watch two people pretend to be step-siblings?
Also, step-siblings isn’t even an illegal relationship in most circumstances
Viscerid on
Yet actual incest isn’t banned, so you can marry and have kids with your first cousin but not watch actors pretending to be stepfamily members. Where is the logic in that
spinosaurs70 on
Again, I don’t like this kind of content, but what is the aim of the government in doing this? All we end up is wasting the goverment time by regulating the content of yes speech whoose production doesn’t harm anyone clearly.
notonetochitchat on
No wanking over the idea of a stranger who’s mum married your dad.
Go fuck your cousin or something productive like that.
dewittless on
I’m absolutely certain that banning pornography will stop step-incest. Definitely didn’t exist prior to the creation of pornography.
InTheEndEntropyWins on
But cousin porn is still OK. Well I guess if you can marry your cousin that’s fine.
This does seem kind of backwards.
Light991 on
We can’t ban cousin marriages because certain minorities would get upset, but let’s ban people filming videos pretending to be step cousins.
ace5762 on
Any progress on the cost of living?
No? Just more war on porn?
Interesting-Voice328 on
Should ban action movies/violence too, especially fast & furious due to people speeding
nickmasonsdrumstick on
Can pump yer cousin. But can’t watch two actors in a made up scenario. Aye that makes sense. Meanwhile the world burns….
Porticulus on
This is such a waste of time. Bloody morality police!
Spamgrenade on
What I want to know is where the hell did incest and step family porn come from in the first place and why is it seemingly so popular?
therealhairykrishna on
I sort of understand the choking ban because, basically, you don’t want 14 year old lads emulating it.
But this just seems a bit puritanical. What problem are they addressing?
EDIT; A re-read of the article seems to suggest it’s only a ban on fake incest porn where one participant is pretending to be under 18? That seems to be a great deal less bonkers than it first appeared.
evenifihateit on
I don’t understand *at all* why this is even on the government’s radar
Such a weird thing to feel the need to legislate on
potatosquire on
Ridiculous. It’s not even illegal to have sex with, or even marry a step sibling, only to view pornography that pretends to feature step siblings. If you ever visit any porn site it will have this content. Once a thumbnail is viewed, even if you don’t click on it, it’s on your computer, potentially findable should your hardrive ever be searched for whatever reason, which now means that anyone who views porn is a criminal. This law does nothing to protect women, nothing to stop incest, all it does is grant the government the power to ruin the lives of a random segment of the population for no reason.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Tobemenwithven on
This is quite mental given this is bar FAR the most popular form of porn on the internet today.
This means anyone who even looks at a porn site is now technically a criminal. Even the thumbnail would be considered an offense to look at.
Theyve just banned porn through the back door.
Genuine query. How can I now look at porn as an adult? Every site has this content.
Imreallyadonut on
So we’re banning videos of sex between people pretending to be (not) related, but won’t ban marriage between people who are actually related because it’ll upset certain parts of the community.
Melodic-Account9247 on
the fuck is up with UK and trying to mandate what people jack off to lol at this point they’ve done it so many times im starting to consider if it’s their kink or sum shit
Inside-Judgment6233 on
Everyone’s on a VPN, so this will change literally nothing
JACOB1137 on
looks like we’re going back to the 80s with schoolgirls girlscouts and nurses. at this rate everything will just be titled ‘sex with woman’ or ‘sex with man’
Tobemenwithven on
*”which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18″*
So whilst being absurd the government are intervening on peoples kinks in a country where sex between cousins is perfectly legal.
It does appear MOST step-incest porn, the most popular kind found on every site on every front page is perfectly legal. It just must not pretend someone is under 18.
A pretty important thing to note if youre worried about a classic step mum fucks adult son thing being an issue.
OF COURSE, how does one define “pretending to be under 18.” Yes there are obvious things but just looking young, being petite is that enough? What about schoolgirl outfit? Thats pretty common in all forms of porn.
I guess Ill just shag my grandmas grandaughter instead. Much more normal thing to do.
MJ-Franklin on
The world’s going to shit and this is what they’re fucking wasting their time with. Absolute bunch of CLOWNS.
ShufflingToGlory on
Can’t wait to be shanked to death in Belmarsh for visiting the front page of Pornhub.
This is actually going to destroy so many lives.
Police have to search your device for whatever reason, find forensic evidence of visits to webpages containing the most widespread and mainstream content in modern pornography.
Congratulations. You’re now a sex offender. Get in the corner with Jimmy Savile and the rest. Absolute swivel eyed lunacy.
RumJackson on
Why are cousin marriages still allowed but two actors shagging isn’t?Â
-Ardea- on
Eventually they’re going to run out of things to ban. I hate pornography but I don’t want a wank police. If it’s consenting adults and there’s no abuse, it’s not my business.
Anyone with a brain is using a VPN anyway due to various other tyrannical policies. So this is pretty much unenforceable anyway. GG boomers
GainsAndPastries on
Me: What you in for dude?
Prisoner: Murder what about you?
Me: Watched Peeping Stepson Gets Caught Peeping on Busty Step Mommy
takesthebiscuit on
Peers couldn’t pass assisted dying but have time for this FML
pdirth on
So…we’re banning Game of Thrones as well then? …I mean, the issue is actors acting as family members having sex, yes? ….This isn’t just another reason to clamp down on adults being adults?
Informal_Drawing on
It’s almost as if porn is acting so this is a really weird governmental overreach from white haired coffin-dodgers with nothing better to do, even if the face of total societal collapse from financial inequality. (That they should be sorting out but apparently they are busy with this).
What’s next, banning actual acting?
What’s that, Shakespeare? Your goose is cooked now, straight to jail with you !
GhostRiders on
Fucking hell it’s like Labour think V for Vendetta is an instruction manual…
AtomicZoZo on
instead of solving any real problems the UK government just picks a random fetish to ban every year
max13x on
‘… anyone found to posses or publish pornography which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18, will be criminalised…’
Interested to see that actual wording. This excerpt suggests the’ step family’ element is only when one person is depicted as under 18
SuboptimalOutcome on
As little as a couple of words in the script of a porn scene is now the difference between it being legal or landing you in jail for two years.
Peppery_Pete100 on
At this point I think they’re just trying to normalise banning online content.
squigs on
Is the song “I am my own grandpa” now illegal? I guess not since it’s not very explicit, but are we assuming that the son and the mother-in-law of the singer have a chaste marriage?
So, if we have two people going at it, it’s fine, but would suddenly become illegal if one of them mentioned their parents were married? Does it then become legal if it turns out the marriage was annulled? Could we have a whole category of quasi-illegal porn that depends on a piece of fan-fiction that establishes their parents are married?
unknowntoff on
Literally could not care less about this sort of issue.
We have far bigger fish to fry, peers should be voting on aligning with the EU, rejoining the single market, a wealth tax, capping energy prices, etc.
40 Comments
Glad to see government challenging the really tough issues facing society today
Damn it, I’m going to have to delete all the step family pornos I have filling my 40TB NAS now 😥
Would rather they dealt with the stupid high cost of living…….
So, you can marry and have children with your cousin, but you can’t watch two people pretend to be step-siblings?
Also, step-siblings isn’t even an illegal relationship in most circumstances
Yet actual incest isn’t banned, so you can marry and have kids with your first cousin but not watch actors pretending to be stepfamily members. Where is the logic in that
Again, I don’t like this kind of content, but what is the aim of the government in doing this? All we end up is wasting the goverment time by regulating the content of yes speech whoose production doesn’t harm anyone clearly.
No wanking over the idea of a stranger who’s mum married your dad.
Go fuck your cousin or something productive like that.
I’m absolutely certain that banning pornography will stop step-incest. Definitely didn’t exist prior to the creation of pornography.
But cousin porn is still OK. Well I guess if you can marry your cousin that’s fine.
This does seem kind of backwards.
We can’t ban cousin marriages because certain minorities would get upset, but let’s ban people filming videos pretending to be step cousins.
Any progress on the cost of living?
No? Just more war on porn?
Should ban action movies/violence too, especially fast & furious due to people speeding
Can pump yer cousin. But can’t watch two actors in a made up scenario. Aye that makes sense. Meanwhile the world burns….
This is such a waste of time. Bloody morality police!
What I want to know is where the hell did incest and step family porn come from in the first place and why is it seemingly so popular?
I sort of understand the choking ban because, basically, you don’t want 14 year old lads emulating it.
But this just seems a bit puritanical. What problem are they addressing?
EDIT; A re-read of the article seems to suggest it’s only a ban on fake incest porn where one participant is pretending to be under 18? That seems to be a great deal less bonkers than it first appeared.
I don’t understand *at all* why this is even on the government’s radar
Such a weird thing to feel the need to legislate on
Ridiculous. It’s not even illegal to have sex with, or even marry a step sibling, only to view pornography that pretends to feature step siblings. If you ever visit any porn site it will have this content. Once a thumbnail is viewed, even if you don’t click on it, it’s on your computer, potentially findable should your hardrive ever be searched for whatever reason, which now means that anyone who views porn is a criminal. This law does nothing to protect women, nothing to stop incest, all it does is grant the government the power to ruin the lives of a random segment of the population for no reason.
[deleted]
This is quite mental given this is bar FAR the most popular form of porn on the internet today.
This means anyone who even looks at a porn site is now technically a criminal. Even the thumbnail would be considered an offense to look at.
Theyve just banned porn through the back door.
Genuine query. How can I now look at porn as an adult? Every site has this content.
So we’re banning videos of sex between people pretending to be (not) related, but won’t ban marriage between people who are actually related because it’ll upset certain parts of the community.
the fuck is up with UK and trying to mandate what people jack off to lol at this point they’ve done it so many times im starting to consider if it’s their kink or sum shit
Everyone’s on a VPN, so this will change literally nothing
looks like we’re going back to the 80s with schoolgirls girlscouts and nurses. at this rate everything will just be titled ‘sex with woman’ or ‘sex with man’
*”which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18″*
So whilst being absurd the government are intervening on peoples kinks in a country where sex between cousins is perfectly legal.
It does appear MOST step-incest porn, the most popular kind found on every site on every front page is perfectly legal. It just must not pretend someone is under 18.
A pretty important thing to note if youre worried about a classic step mum fucks adult son thing being an issue.
OF COURSE, how does one define “pretending to be under 18.” Yes there are obvious things but just looking young, being petite is that enough? What about schoolgirl outfit? Thats pretty common in all forms of porn.
I guess Ill just shag my grandmas grandaughter instead. Much more normal thing to do.
The world’s going to shit and this is what they’re fucking wasting their time with. Absolute bunch of CLOWNS.
Can’t wait to be shanked to death in Belmarsh for visiting the front page of Pornhub.
This is actually going to destroy so many lives.
Police have to search your device for whatever reason, find forensic evidence of visits to webpages containing the most widespread and mainstream content in modern pornography.
Congratulations. You’re now a sex offender. Get in the corner with Jimmy Savile and the rest. Absolute swivel eyed lunacy.
Why are cousin marriages still allowed but two actors shagging isn’t?Â
Eventually they’re going to run out of things to ban. I hate pornography but I don’t want a wank police. If it’s consenting adults and there’s no abuse, it’s not my business.
Anyone with a brain is using a VPN anyway due to various other tyrannical policies. So this is pretty much unenforceable anyway. GG boomers
Me: What you in for dude?
Prisoner: Murder what about you?
Me: Watched Peeping Stepson Gets Caught Peeping on Busty Step Mommy
Peers couldn’t pass assisted dying but have time for this FML
So…we’re banning Game of Thrones as well then? …I mean, the issue is actors acting as family members having sex, yes? ….This isn’t just another reason to clamp down on adults being adults?
It’s almost as if porn is acting so this is a really weird governmental overreach from white haired coffin-dodgers with nothing better to do, even if the face of total societal collapse from financial inequality. (That they should be sorting out but apparently they are busy with this).
What’s next, banning actual acting?
What’s that, Shakespeare? Your goose is cooked now, straight to jail with you !
Fucking hell it’s like Labour think V for Vendetta is an instruction manual…
instead of solving any real problems the UK government just picks a random fetish to ban every year
‘… anyone found to posses or publish pornography which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18, will be criminalised…’
Interested to see that actual wording. This excerpt suggests the’ step family’ element is only when one person is depicted as under 18
As little as a couple of words in the script of a porn scene is now the difference between it being legal or landing you in jail for two years.
At this point I think they’re just trying to normalise banning online content.
Is the song “I am my own grandpa” now illegal? I guess not since it’s not very explicit, but are we assuming that the son and the mother-in-law of the singer have a chaste marriage?
So, if we have two people going at it, it’s fine, but would suddenly become illegal if one of them mentioned their parents were married? Does it then become legal if it turns out the marriage was annulled? Could we have a whole category of quasi-illegal porn that depends on a piece of fan-fiction that establishes their parents are married?
Literally could not care less about this sort of issue.
We have far bigger fish to fry, peers should be voting on aligning with the EU, rejoining the single market, a wealth tax, capping energy prices, etc.
This is just noise