Also, why isn’t it mandatory that the Justices give their reasoning as to why they made their ruling?
ImpressiveReview4573 on
mine aswell its not like he will release the full snap benifts he doesn’t care about democracy.
Done327 on
Well, the Supreme Court is corrupt so this shouldn’t be a surprise
MrBartokomous on
Utterly despicable. At least Marie Antoinette offered cake.
Many-Lengthiness9779 on
Protest in their neighborhoods, bang spoons on drums. They don’t deserve a break from their madness.
LordSiravant on
Godfuckingdammit.
ToadallyNormalHuman on
They are denying children food. Children.
iseethemgoats on
When level of evil are you on when you go crying to your pocket supreme court on a Friday night to make sure you can starve poor children?
Impossible_Score_901 on
Of course they did. Nobody didn’t see that coming.
RamonaQ-JunieB on
They are the literal scum of the earth.
NeededToChooseAName on
“So why don’t you want people to eat again?”
“Because if we give them SNAP benefits we’ll lose the leverage to get what we want”
“And what is it you want the leverage for to get?”
“Denying everyone healthcare.”
No-Cup-8096 on
Starving the disadvantaged, how satanic of him.
Guacsalsaqueso on
I hope Newsom becomes President in 2028, not because I agree with him on everything, but he will make it his life’s mission to make every piece of garbage in our government pay for what they’ve done to us. I want him to go completely unhinged and make them all regret their treasonous actions
ElleM848645 on
Ok so another article I read said Katanji Brown issued the stay, but this one says John Roberts did. So which is it?
emotionless-pig476 on
omfg ugh i cannot stand this country being ran by absolute fucking idiots
burglin on
Horrible for every SNAP recipient who didn’t vote for him. Absolutely inhumane. Happy for the others to starve, though. They voted for this and are inflicting hunger on others. For that, they deserve it.
Tanukisus on
gee didn’t see that coming! Sigh.
WHSRWizard on
1. This was issued by Judge Jackson Brown.
2. It has nothing to do with the merits of the case
3. It basically only lasts through the weekend.
4. The purpose is to allow the appeals court to hear it and decide it, presumably on Monday.
Dangerous_Sushi_ on
So how many maga are on snap
oneseason2000 on
Doesn’t this action by US Supreme Court Justice Brown Jackson provide an opportunity to force POTUS to distribute full SNAP payments for longer?
“After a Boston appeals court declined to immediately intervene, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an order late Friday pausing the requirement to distribute full SNAP payments until the appeals court rules on whether to issue a more lasting pause. Jackson handles emergency matters from Massachusetts.”
I can’t help but feel like the money allocated for food funds has been embezzled elsewhere.
I’m not even sure how or how that would work but I can’t help but believe ~~they’re stealing~~ they’ve stolen the money.
AlwaysBullishAYYY on
absolutely disgusting and evil
erikhow on
Please read the articles first, this is a MANDATORY STAY that Katanji Brown Jackson has to put on this case and determine if the 1st court of appeals will make a decision to step in within the first 48 hours.
EDIT: this article says John Roberts issued it but other reporting does not
EDIT X2: I’m starting to think this article could just be entirely wrong because it is absolutely Katanji Brown Jackson’s decisions and actions
MaresATX on
Look at who issued the stay before responding. And the reason for it.
RubberyDolphin on
This is not a ruling. The article is misleading and uniformed. It’s a two-day administrative stay for technical reasons (I’m guessing but prob the Court of Appeals issued a quick denial of request to stay and gov filed an appeal, which could cause jurisdictional issues and slow things down). Under the circumstances, this basically means nobody gets in trouble if it’s true that the government can’t move the money fast enough (on Friday) to comply with the original order and leaves the Court of Appeals with the responsibility to say on Monday what should happen while the appeal is pending. The question is why the government would appeal and need more time if there are enough funds to pay all benefits for two weeks—really should be no excuse for this.
dentz1 on
This happens the same week one man gets a trillion dollar payday.
lesigh on
The French revolted for less. When will America wake up?
31 Comments
So fucking evil omg
He really doesn’t want Americans to eat.
Big L for the Supreme Court
Why.
Also, why isn’t it mandatory that the Justices give their reasoning as to why they made their ruling?
mine aswell its not like he will release the full snap benifts he doesn’t care about democracy.
Well, the Supreme Court is corrupt so this shouldn’t be a surprise
Utterly despicable. At least Marie Antoinette offered cake.
Protest in their neighborhoods, bang spoons on drums. They don’t deserve a break from their madness.
Godfuckingdammit.
They are denying children food. Children.
When level of evil are you on when you go crying to your pocket supreme court on a Friday night to make sure you can starve poor children?
Of course they did. Nobody didn’t see that coming.
They are the literal scum of the earth.
“So why don’t you want people to eat again?”
“Because if we give them SNAP benefits we’ll lose the leverage to get what we want”
“And what is it you want the leverage for to get?”
“Denying everyone healthcare.”
Starving the disadvantaged, how satanic of him.
I hope Newsom becomes President in 2028, not because I agree with him on everything, but he will make it his life’s mission to make every piece of garbage in our government pay for what they’ve done to us. I want him to go completely unhinged and make them all regret their treasonous actions
Ok so another article I read said Katanji Brown issued the stay, but this one says John Roberts did. So which is it?
omfg ugh i cannot stand this country being ran by absolute fucking idiots
Horrible for every SNAP recipient who didn’t vote for him. Absolutely inhumane. Happy for the others to starve, though. They voted for this and are inflicting hunger on others. For that, they deserve it.
gee didn’t see that coming! Sigh.
1. This was issued by Judge Jackson Brown.
2. It has nothing to do with the merits of the case
3. It basically only lasts through the weekend.
4. The purpose is to allow the appeals court to hear it and decide it, presumably on Monday.
So how many maga are on snap
Doesn’t this action by US Supreme Court Justice Brown Jackson provide an opportunity to force POTUS to distribute full SNAP payments for longer?
“After a Boston appeals court declined to immediately intervene, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an order late Friday pausing the requirement to distribute full SNAP payments until the appeals court rules on whether to issue a more lasting pause. Jackson handles emergency matters from Massachusetts.”
[https://apnews.com/article/snap-food-government-shutdown-trump-a807e9f0c0a7213e203c074553dc1f9b](https://apnews.com/article/snap-food-government-shutdown-trump-a807e9f0c0a7213e203c074553dc1f9b)
I can’t help but feel like the money allocated for food funds has been embezzled elsewhere.
I’m not even sure how or how that would work but I can’t help but believe ~~they’re stealing~~ they’ve stolen the money.
absolutely disgusting and evil
Please read the articles first, this is a MANDATORY STAY that Katanji Brown Jackson has to put on this case and determine if the 1st court of appeals will make a decision to step in within the first 48 hours.
EDIT: this article says John Roberts issued it but other reporting does not
EDIT X2: I’m starting to think this article could just be entirely wrong because it is absolutely Katanji Brown Jackson’s decisions and actions
Look at who issued the stay before responding. And the reason for it.
This is not a ruling. The article is misleading and uniformed. It’s a two-day administrative stay for technical reasons (I’m guessing but prob the Court of Appeals issued a quick denial of request to stay and gov filed an appeal, which could cause jurisdictional issues and slow things down). Under the circumstances, this basically means nobody gets in trouble if it’s true that the government can’t move the money fast enough (on Friday) to comply with the original order and leaves the Court of Appeals with the responsibility to say on Monday what should happen while the appeal is pending. The question is why the government would appeal and need more time if there are enough funds to pay all benefits for two weeks—really should be no excuse for this.
This happens the same week one man gets a trillion dollar payday.
The French revolted for less. When will America wake up?
SCOTUS is breathtakingly corrupt….news at 11