Republicans have been taking Ls all this week! LMAO!
CouchPotato-Queen on
The National guards should be used for real emergencies not political stunts. Trump is already trying to overreach his authority
cuminmyshitsock on
what happens when he ignores the judge and does it anyway?
nasorrty346tfrgser on
So if the national guards still follow the POTUS order on this one, how can my fellow “thank you for your services” leftist spin it then?
SwimmingThroughHoney on
And like all the others, the injunction will be blocked.
The problem, as always, is this:
>[The judge] found that Trump failed to meet the two criteria he used to invoke federal code to mobilize the National Guard: there was no danger of a rebellion against U.S. government authority, Immergut ruled, and officers have not been thwarted from executing federal law…She also found that general federal agency staffing problems are “minimally impeding” ICE’s enforcement of immigration law.
Anyone with basic critical thinking skills would agree. The problem is that judges are supposed to rule on legal matters. There is no legal test to determine what constitutes a “rebellion” or where the line is for when officers are impeded. It’s this same logic that SCOTUS (not the current Court, but a past one) used to say that the President has the sole authority to determine what constitutes an “insurrection” and that cannot be checked by the courts.
5 Comments
Republicans have been taking Ls all this week! LMAO!
The National guards should be used for real emergencies not political stunts. Trump is already trying to overreach his authority
what happens when he ignores the judge and does it anyway?
So if the national guards still follow the POTUS order on this one, how can my fellow “thank you for your services” leftist spin it then?
And like all the others, the injunction will be blocked.
The problem, as always, is this:
>[The judge] found that Trump failed to meet the two criteria he used to invoke federal code to mobilize the National Guard: there was no danger of a rebellion against U.S. government authority, Immergut ruled, and officers have not been thwarted from executing federal law…She also found that general federal agency staffing problems are “minimally impeding” ICE’s enforcement of immigration law.
Anyone with basic critical thinking skills would agree. The problem is that judges are supposed to rule on legal matters. There is no legal test to determine what constitutes a “rebellion” or where the line is for when officers are impeded. It’s this same logic that SCOTUS (not the current Court, but a past one) used to say that the President has the sole authority to determine what constitutes an “insurrection” and that cannot be checked by the courts.