Share.

24 Comments

  1. theassassintherapist on

    That is… unexpected. I expected the supreme court to just rubber-stamp right wing agendas with no care about legality.

  2. Forsaken-Cattle2659 on

    Kim’s forehead is giving Peyton Manning’s a run for his money. No wonder she’s so full of hate.

  3. nasorrty346tfrgser on

    I felt back in 2022 they knew their ruling would be controversial, but still didn’t expect the backlash that big.

    So this time they rather not risk it, especially they wanted to save this kind of controversial ruling for more important things, like Trump 3rd term, birthright citizenship, unitary executive etc, and most importantly, domestically deployment of troops

  4. New_pollution1086 on

    Good, kick this evil umpa loompa looking bitch back to the shit hole she crawled out of.

  5. CEOPhilosopher on

    I’m so cynical at this point that I’m wondering if they did this just so we can have that glimmer of hope before they rubberstamp whatever stupid thing the Diaperfuhrer is pushing.

    Then again, maybe enough of them realize that Trump is declining in age, health, and power, and that voters are fully rejecting MAGA ideals (at least those who aren’t a part of the red hat cult). Polls last week showed that.

  6. HEYYYYYYYY_SATAN on

    What a roller coaster we’ve been on.

    Tuesday-Saturday: Celebrating election results

    Sunday: Livid that the Decorumcrats caved like they always do.

    Today: Celebrating that Kim Davis can fuck off for good.

  7. Not terribly surprising. The 3 liberal justices obviously weren’t going to grant cert, and Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and ACB were pretty much guaranteed No votes as well.

    I assume Alito and Thomas voted to grant cert. Not sure how Roberts would have gone — he didn’t like Obergefell, but overturning Obergefell wasn’t the main legal question.

  8. The lady pushing conservative christian values against gay marriage.

    And shes been divorced twice.

  9. MirthandMystery on

    This was a frivolous lawsuit at the outset. That it for bumped up so high was ridiculous.

    That said, another may arise soon enough to replace it and SCOTUS will be happy to consider that, and inch closer to repealing or actually do it. Will be such huge backlash if I may for legal reasons (many gays are parents) though it’s unlikely to happen.. but in this era don’t temp fate by saying it can’t happen here.

    Progress once assumed safe with other decisions has been recently lost.

Leave A Reply