For a moment there I thought that was going to end with, “Here’s why that’s bad for Biden.”
ACasualRead on
“One was a January 2019 email to Wolff in which Epstein claimed Trump “knew about the girls.”
The email does not say what exactly Trump knew.”
I mean…..
ChopperChange on
>While the analysis shows Trump is mentioned more than 1,500 times, a significant proportion of the references are in news reports from 2016 onward, covering Trump’s first campaign for the presidency and his first term in the White House.
In other words, there’s been undeniable evidence of Trump’s crimes against children for over a decade now.
NobodyTellPoeDameron on
I would expect better from the CBC. With reporting like this, Trump may annex Canada just to have another friendly media source in the US. They’ll fit nicely next to Fox News.
Tokie-Dokie on
I’m going to assume that there are some people out there in the world who aren’t mentioned in the child-rape/sex-trafficking documents at all—let alone 1,500 times.
Roddyzod on
Yep, even if they had video evidence of trump diddling kids his supporters will deny it and defend him and he’ll still have the same 35-40% of voters as his built in base.
Puzzled-Duck4047 on
Somebody’s got pictures somewhere, they’re saving for a rainy payday, and Trump can’t take that to the bank.
nerdyplayer on
any body brave enough to see what fake news conservative sub is saying?
thepartypantser on
Sure a lot of these are post 2016 news articles, but not all of them are.
Let’s put it this way.
There is far, far, *far* more evidence Trump has had shady dealings with Epstein than there is the 2020 election was stolen.
strangersadvice on
>”I think you might suggest to putin that lavrov can get insight on talking to me,” Epstein wrote.
So, what do you make of this?
ThisOneGoesElven on
His being involved in a lot of correspondence about Trump’s campaign doesn’t sound as harmless as you think it does, CBC. What the naive fuck?
This_means_lore on
“Here’s how that’s bad for Biden”
thistimelineisweird on
Trump was the #1 client. Always. But also probably finance connection to Russia.
nerdyplayer on
BTW anybody have that clip with Mike said donnie was an undercover agent?
elena_ct on
He admitted on national radio to Howard Stern that he regularly would go into girl’s changing rooms in order to see naked underage girls. Why would anyone think this stuff can’t be true either? At what point would it be too much?
WallNumerous3230 on
Trump IS the Epstein files.
eatmynet on
Supreme Court made Trump immune from the criticism of qanon too apparently. Remember PizzaGate? I know, I am old school, I shouldn’t remember things from the past but I do… Who remembers when conservatives went on and on about Clinton and liberals with this?
Nothing to see here- we all knew he was a repulsive pedophile. Now what? More of nothing?Disgusting.
tcoh1s on
You know whose names DON’T appear thousands of time in those files? People that didn’t have sex with children. Trump did. His name doesn’t just appear. He himself allowed his name to be there because of the sick shit he’s done.
And he better pay a price for once in his life.
Otherwise-Sun2486 on
Republicans remember have safe travels and food for thanksgiving and to thank your lord and savior for all that he has done to stick it to the dems for you.
kevendo on
Meanwhile, you and I and absolutely everyone you and I know are mentioned zero times in the Epstein files.
Because we’re not pedophiles or lifelong serial sexual abusers.
Highthere_90 on
Once is more then enough, 1500 should be straight to jail
Otherwise_Funny8620 on
The standard excuse i hear now is that people don’t care how awful he is as a person. They voted for his policies not him.to which I reply, “so facist doctrine, misogyny, elitist financial policy, punish the poor for existing while sending billions in aid to anyone that will kiss hisbass. Got it”
Jugaimo on
I’m starting to think he might be connected somehow.
MariachiArchery on
That feels like too many.
a_passionate_man on
1500 times after redaction, that is…
ThirdSunRising on
“Trump and Epstein were besties, here’s why that’s bad news for Democrats”
Just_Jules5 on
So I went through the documents, tried to process as much as I could while skimming for email to email communications. There are a lot of pages in there that don’t cover just Epstein – there are essays, graphs and pie charts on the economy and various other things, environmental impact studies, education etc. What I found to be most surprising is how they completely roast Trump almost every time he’s mentioned – that’s really crazy coming from a group of child abusers and cohorts.
Some of the wildest quotes:
“He is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged…no questions Donald’s statement is goofy, early dementia?”
“He is scaring the shit out of me now. He could well tank the global economy”
“He feels alone and is nuts!!! I told everyone from day one, evil beyond belief. Mad, and most thought I was speaking metaphorically. It’s obvious he could crack. Stormy Daniel’s? Lies after lies after lies”
“The richest man in the world is so cheap, his former bridge girl and toy lives on a friends sofa”
“How guilty is Donald? Of cruelty surely, of gross ignorance surely, of being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely, of being over line on family profiting very likely, of gross disregard for appearances almost surely. Of Russians having financial leverage. Less clear. Of Russians helping in election with complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain”
“Your world does not understand how dumb he really is”
“Trump was the boy in pre-school who you just knew was going to throw a truck at another kids head”
28 Comments
For a moment there I thought that was going to end with, “Here’s why that’s bad for Biden.”
“One was a January 2019 email to Wolff in which Epstein claimed Trump “knew about the girls.”
The email does not say what exactly Trump knew.”
I mean…..
>While the analysis shows Trump is mentioned more than 1,500 times, a significant proportion of the references are in news reports from 2016 onward, covering Trump’s first campaign for the presidency and his first term in the White House.
In other words, there’s been undeniable evidence of Trump’s crimes against children for over a decade now.
I would expect better from the CBC. With reporting like this, Trump may annex Canada just to have another friendly media source in the US. They’ll fit nicely next to Fox News.
I’m going to assume that there are some people out there in the world who aren’t mentioned in the child-rape/sex-trafficking documents at all—let alone 1,500 times.
Yep, even if they had video evidence of trump diddling kids his supporters will deny it and defend him and he’ll still have the same 35-40% of voters as his built in base.
Somebody’s got pictures somewhere, they’re saving for a rainy payday, and Trump can’t take that to the bank.
any body brave enough to see what fake news conservative sub is saying?
Sure a lot of these are post 2016 news articles, but not all of them are.
Let’s put it this way.
There is far, far, *far* more evidence Trump has had shady dealings with Epstein than there is the 2020 election was stolen.
>”I think you might suggest to putin that lavrov can get insight on talking to me,” Epstein wrote.
So, what do you make of this?
His being involved in a lot of correspondence about Trump’s campaign doesn’t sound as harmless as you think it does, CBC. What the naive fuck?
“Here’s how that’s bad for Biden”
Trump was the #1 client. Always. But also probably finance connection to Russia.
BTW anybody have that clip with Mike said donnie was an undercover agent?
He admitted on national radio to Howard Stern that he regularly would go into girl’s changing rooms in order to see naked underage girls. Why would anyone think this stuff can’t be true either? At what point would it be too much?
Trump IS the Epstein files.
Supreme Court made Trump immune from the criticism of qanon too apparently. Remember PizzaGate? I know, I am old school, I shouldn’t remember things from the past but I do… Who remembers when conservatives went on and on about Clinton and liberals with this?
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory)
How Alex Jones went on for endless hours. Actually one armed man went there to investigate.
[https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/22/533941689/pizzagate-gunman-sentenced-to-4-years-in-prison](https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/22/533941689/pizzagate-gunman-sentenced-to-4-years-in-prison)
Here’s interview kind of
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXApkzwKIh8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXApkzwKIh8)
Nothing to see here- we all knew he was a repulsive pedophile. Now what? More of nothing?Disgusting.
You know whose names DON’T appear thousands of time in those files? People that didn’t have sex with children. Trump did. His name doesn’t just appear. He himself allowed his name to be there because of the sick shit he’s done.
And he better pay a price for once in his life.
Republicans remember have safe travels and food for thanksgiving and to thank your lord and savior for all that he has done to stick it to the dems for you.
Meanwhile, you and I and absolutely everyone you and I know are mentioned zero times in the Epstein files.
Because we’re not pedophiles or lifelong serial sexual abusers.
Once is more then enough, 1500 should be straight to jail
The standard excuse i hear now is that people don’t care how awful he is as a person. They voted for his policies not him.to which I reply, “so facist doctrine, misogyny, elitist financial policy, punish the poor for existing while sending billions in aid to anyone that will kiss hisbass. Got it”
I’m starting to think he might be connected somehow.
That feels like too many.
1500 times after redaction, that is…
“Trump and Epstein were besties, here’s why that’s bad news for Democrats”
So I went through the documents, tried to process as much as I could while skimming for email to email communications. There are a lot of pages in there that don’t cover just Epstein – there are essays, graphs and pie charts on the economy and various other things, environmental impact studies, education etc. What I found to be most surprising is how they completely roast Trump almost every time he’s mentioned – that’s really crazy coming from a group of child abusers and cohorts.
Some of the wildest quotes:
“He is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged…no questions Donald’s statement is goofy, early dementia?”
“He is scaring the shit out of me now. He could well tank the global economy”
“He feels alone and is nuts!!! I told everyone from day one, evil beyond belief. Mad, and most thought I was speaking metaphorically. It’s obvious he could crack. Stormy Daniel’s? Lies after lies after lies”
“The richest man in the world is so cheap, his former bridge girl and toy lives on a friends sofa”
“How guilty is Donald? Of cruelty surely, of gross ignorance surely, of being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely, of being over line on family profiting very likely, of gross disregard for appearances almost surely. Of Russians having financial leverage. Less clear. Of Russians helping in election with complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain”
“Your world does not understand how dumb he really is”
“Trump was the boy in pre-school who you just knew was going to throw a truck at another kids head”