Share.

26 Comments

  1. I can’t wait to see redacted files and democratic names only just to see MAGA folks sop it up like the idiots they are.

  2. saltundvinegar on

    The files are now fucked or they intend on holding this up forever with “investigations”. There’s nothing to be excited about here

  3. InorganicProductions on

    Literally the entire world knows he has his name removed from them. Who’s he trying to fool?

  4. This whole thing is way too easy after everything they’ve done to prevent the release of the files, including the 40-day long shutdown to prevent them from voting on it.

    Something is definitely up.

  5. thatrlyoatsmymilk on

    I feel like best case scenario here is they are released, almost definitely extremely redacted, and some other country decides to release what they have unredacted 

  6. ValkorionThrowaway on

    What are the chances they tampered with the files? And if they did is there an actual possibility that they could get away with it?

    Even more serious question: Do the dems have a failsafe/contingency plan in case that happens?

  7. He couldn’t have a big press event with the victims surrounding him as he signs the bill and claims to be a pioneer for women and giving justice to victims

    …B/c he was Epstein’s BFF for decades, he’s in the files more than anyone else, bragged about sexually assaulting women to a NBC anchor, has been accused himself by dozens of women, AND was found liable for committing sexual abuse by a jury.

    What Epstein victim would even want to be in the same room as him?

  8. Pam Bondi has already gone on record saying “We will follow the law” and heavily implying they’re going to use the “Active investigations” loophole to claim virtually everything is evidence in an active investigation.

    The courts aren’t going to intervene, Trump is going to say “I already instructed Bondi to follow the law”, and the GOP are gonna say “Welp, we tried! Nothing else we can do!”

    That’s why they were suddenly so willing to pass this. They can now just say “We did everything we could to release the files!” and dismiss the entire issue instead of having to dodge and work around it.

  9. DancesWithElectrons on

    The DOJ will hold anything incriminating under the “ongoing investigation “ excuse. Come back in 2029

  10. We are about to see why Trump fired a bunch of people at the DOJ and placed people who represented him in his many trials and hearings (especially the AG and Deputy AG)

  11. Trump may think the fix is in but it won’t work. The victims lawyers and others have the complete files. If Bondi et al leave out incriminating evidence it will only get leaked. Bondi looked very nervous today – she’s headed for eventual conspiracy and obstruction charges that sent Nixon’s AG goon John Mitchell to jail.

  12. Valuable_Sea_4709 on

    Great where can I request a copy of the 3-5 LTO-6 data cassettes (1.5tb-7.5tb depending on specific disk and data types) that were seized from his New York property? (Official seizure list includes 3 tapes, and 2 drives, stands to reason those drives had tapes in them)

    At the time that was the cutting edge in archival data storage, very very expensive, and exceptionally durable.

    And I don’t particularly need a copy, so much as I need a directory listing.

    I suspect those to be security camera archives. And if they are… That could very well be years of footage from dozens of cameras at the time.

    And if they are every single one of those trillions of frame of that footage needs to come out, any children censored, but we simply must know who was there, and what they did there.

    Or are we supposed to believe that not a single frame of security camera footage existed? That a Billionaire Criminal, with millions of dollars in assets in a multi-million dollar mansion in New York City, on billionaires row, didn’t have security cameras?

    Or on his private island? Or on his 70,000 acre ranch?

    The video and photographic evidence seized must all be made public, absent only the children.

    Every single person that hurt a child as a result of Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile ring needs to be criminally charged, and will be easily convicted with video evidence.

  13. Okay- so what’s the chance the documents/evidence has been tampered with to implicate Democratic Party members/donors?

    Like, there are safe guards against that…. right?

    RELEASE THE FILES- no cover ups on either side of the aisle.

  14. Its simple, they know this looks terrible for trump. He’s done, and off to pedo retirement. Maga will fall in line eventually, as long as, another despot is running. The american people have memories of goldfish. So yes trump is done, but the right wing fascists are just beginning.

  15. catatoniccutie on

    Any decent human being with a shred of empathy doesn’t care if a pedophile is a Democrat or a Republican. Being a kid raper is wrong, Donald! I can’t believe he can just publicly say he’s only concerned with justice when it comes to his political opponents and will protect the rest. And his cronies, most of them parents, just nod and agree?? It’s nauseating. What about justice for the victims? What about protecting children from further victimization? That’s all we non-sociopaths care about! I can’t believe this is reality.

  16. Either Trump literally thinks he’s a king ordained by god and can do whatever he wants—all the way up to participating in human sex trafficking and nothing will be done to him. Or this has been highly redacted and scrubbed clean.

Leave A Reply