Share.

39 Comments

  1. hitting a drug boat four times sounds like they really wanted to make sure it wasn’t just a fishing trip. that’s precision plus intent.

  2. Since when do we give drug traffickers the death penalty in the USA? The Sackler family is still living in their mansions. Those boats aren’t capable of making it to the US mainland.

  3. OptimalCabinet2361 on

    Is Hegseth and the Cabinet trying to score a price negotiation on Cocaine?
    Most that cabinet are active hard drugs users. You can tell by their eyes. And the ranting and amped up craziness of their behaviors.

  4. negativepositiv on

    Why does this title concede the unproven claim that these boats were transporting drugs?

  5. God forbid there’s a retaliatory strike on a random USA boat. Everyone will have shocked pikachu face.

  6. How long til Kegseth takes aim on so-called “drug boats” off the U.S. coast. After all they have to offload their wares and it won’t be in a major port? I live on the Gulf Coast and it’s gospel to never pick up any packages floating in the water because that’s where/how the real smugglers drop cargo. Makes you think.

  7. epicredditdude1 on

    Why was the U.S. so insistent on insuring this particular boat had no survivors and sank to the bottom of the ocean?

    Four drone strikes on a small motorboat.

    This whole ordeal reeks of a coverup. 

  8. The cost of this “military op” could have funded the rehabilitation of every fentanyl drug addiction. Just like “saving” unborn babies to just pull their parents SNAP to feed them properly

  9. They had to make sure they murdered everyone on board so they could lie about what the boat was really doing. There is no other explanation, especially in light of Donald’s new hobby of pardoning people who actually did have a part in illegal drug supply/sales.

  10. Pete managed to commit the one war crime that’s literally used as THE EXAMPLE of a war crime

    DoD Law of War Manual:

    18.3.2.1 Clearly Illegal Orders to Commit Law of War Violations. The requirement to refuse to comply with orders to commit law of war violations applies to orders to perform conduct that is clearly illegal or orders that the subordinate knows, in fact, are illegal. For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.

    (This isn’t mine but I forgot to save what redditor did. Credit should be theirs)

  11. No wonder there was so much “fog of war” after 4-tapping a fishing boat with the friggin Navy

  12. delusiongenerator on

    Until the pentagon provides evidence to the contrary, it was just “a boat in the Caribbean”, most likely a fishing boat.

  13. alloutofchewingum on

    There were no drugs. This is just random mass murder. They might as well be lighting hobos on fire in the park.

  14. Bishopjones2112 on

    Oh wow, so that’s not just an extra hit which would have been illegal, that’s an empty the clip kinda moment. So many people should have stopped this.

  15. >Military struck drug boat in Caribbean 4 times in Sept. 2 attack, says US official

    The first was an illegal abuse of military power, and the last three were simply murder.

Leave A Reply