Share.

23 Comments

  1. So they violated his 4th and 5th amendment rights. Pretty stupid of them to throw away a case like this but the law is the law.

  2. LateBreaking-7782 on

    The double edged sword of a surveillance state is that it’s harder to lie about these sort of things

  3. Lugi is smart AF.

    When the cops ask you a question what do you do? Shut the fuck up. When they threaten you, shut the fuck up. Especially if you  are guilty as hell.

    The first time you open your mouth is to your lawyer.

    Unless you enjoy prison.

    Don’t trust cops, ever. Even if they try to give your kids candy on Halloween. Tell them who they are, the enemy of the people.

  4. DrEmil-Schaffhausen on

    I’m no lawyer, but isn’t he the idiot for continuing to talk? I mean if you say you don’t want to answer questions and **keep answering questions**, isn’t that fair game for the prosecution to use? Or is it the “not reading his Miranda rights for 20 minutes” that’s the issue?

  5. Plus, luigi and i were playing scrabble on the night of the incident, so i don’t know why he’s still locked up.

  6. It’s going to be hilarious when he gets off. You think the Saint Luigi stuff is crazy now, it’ll be a religion

  7. Live_Editor_1964 on

    Whatever he said was allowed. He had the right to leave. If he was arrested and they pressed without being mirandized then it’s not admissible. His lawyers know this and this is just a Hail Mary. His statements will be admitted for jury trial.

  8. Video didn’t look like Luigi anyway, at least respecting his rights is a dignified way to let him go

  9. Unless he explicitly asked for a lawyer cops are allowed to continue to question him. And he’s and idiot for continuing to answer their questions.

    Not that it matters. He was with me building bikes for orphans.

  10. Is a person free to leave? No > interview is custodial > they must be mirandized before asking questions that could infer guilt.

    Done fucked up

  11. It’s strange- he is guilty and innocent in court of public opinion.
    With regard to the law- as we have learned recently and in the past, it only applies to some. The police screwed up the investigation and their case from the get go. I have a feeling that it won’t matter and the government won’t allow him to walk away.

  12. justfortherofls on

    I’m half expecting trump to truth social that he pardoned him but also played an uno reverse card sending him straight to jail. It’s a silly enough timeline that this may actually happen.

  13. aeternusvoxpopuli on

    It’s becoming abundantly clear that they used illegal surveillance and data collection methods to not only triangulate his location, but determine who he was. None of this should be admissible. The chances of that many cops showing up over an “anonymous tip” and then arresting him on forgery charges…just so sketchy.

    [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction)

    People should read up on Parallel construction. Only reason they found the alleged shooter was because of warantless surveillance methods that they would usually avoid using unless the victim was a healthcare company CEO. It not only exposes the extent of our surveillance state in such a naked manner, but the extent to which they’re willing to use it to capture those they deem a threat to capitalism and corporations. Why don’t they use this same technology to catch other murderers when the victim is poor?

  14. Worldly-Travel5589 on

    You don’t have to be mirandized at time of arrest, that’s a myth, and the defense knows it. The only way to assert your right to remain silent is to proactively assert it, and request a lawyer. I like the guy and think he’s innocent, but this is grasping at straws

Leave A Reply