Share.

15 Comments

  1. Wild it took decades to release these. I guess the government caved in due to the public pressure

  2. ranchoparksteve on

    Wouldn’t the court also have the grand jury files? Would the court defy its own orders?

  3. ol_dirty_applesauce on

    This is not an adequate replacement for the release of the “Epstein files” that the federal government (White House) is sitting on and refusing to make public.

  4. TemporalColdWarrior on

    I sincerely doubt anything incriminating Trump and goons will be in Maxwell’s GJ indictment. For that we need a whole lot of subpoenas, bank records, and emails.

  5. I have some questions for those with legal training:

    – what would be the expected timeline for the release?
    – who will do the redacting to protect victims?
    – can DOJ file to prevent this unsealing?

  6. >Judge unseals Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury materials

    No. The judge *ordered* them to be unsealed. Expect a DOJ filing to stay the order, and appellate agreement to the stay, in 3 … 2 … 1 …

  7. Nothing to see here.

    *The public is not likely to learn much, if anything, new about Epstein or Maxwell from the unsealed grand jury material.>Englemayer, in his order Tuesday, said that the DOJ’s original motion to unseal the files “misled victims — and the public at large in holding out the Maxwell grand jury materials as essential to the goal of ‘transparency to the American public,’ when in fact the grand jury materials would not add to public knowledge.”*

    *“The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor,” Englemayer wrote in August when he rejected the DOJ’s first bid to unseal the material.*

Leave A Reply