Damn, if true, that’s some shady AF stuff. Knew there was something fishy ’bout all that. More layers than an onion, these politician games 😒🤔 If there’s smoke, there’s fire, right? We gotta dig deeper, yall. Can’t just bury this under the rug or dismiss as fake news. Just sayin’.
ShrimpieAC on
Why even bother? It’s already been seen. All this does is make things look worse.
HellaTroi on
No a paywall, but I’m not able to get past their email requirement.
9lobaldude on
They only surprise here is that the photo was published in the original release. Someone’s losing his job
panopticchaos on
They missed his name in one of them (last page), it’s as disgusting as you imagine.
Trump is not a victim put them back in stop defending this sick pedophile
RipErRiley on
You can’t trust this administration with anything. They are the true swamp.
cute_toastieee2 on
Woah, woah, Epstein docs getting a MAGA cleanup pass is wild. This whole thing reeks.
Deeschuck on
Photo? As in singular? We all know it’s way more than that.
YodaWattsLee on
Ah, there’s the double-speak, diversionary headline.
Now, when there are legitimate complaints that Trump was removed from the Epstein files (which he absolutely has been), they can just point to this and say “They only removed one picture, that picture was nothing incriminating, and it was removed to protect a victim.”
vegasman31 on
Yet more proof of old dangly orange being a pedo! A disgusting individual!
Yelloeisok on
And they added a picture of Clinton and Michael Jackson- that supposedly wasn’t in the government Epstein files because they pulled it off public records.
phosdick on
Wouldn’t this constitute “destruction of evidence”?
>18 U.S. Code § 1519 – Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
mikeg040 on
Oh wow, No way!
2_Sheds_Jackson on
Does this mean that all of the photos and documents in the desk drawer are part of the evidence that needs to be released?
nwgdad on
This gets better and better! We now have proof that the MAGAT regime is hiding files.
xx_BruhDog_xx on
Bruh we knew they were scrubbing the files, that’s what took so long. The number of victims vs the number of people charged is wildly suspect as well…
flyinghighdoves on
Bump because Justice…and Democracy
BrianHoweBattle on
On the plus side this executive branch is exceedingly bad at execution.
VLHACS on
Wouldn’t it be ironic that the omission actually brings MORE attention to Trump?
24 Comments
Damn, if true, that’s some shady AF stuff. Knew there was something fishy ’bout all that. More layers than an onion, these politician games 😒🤔 If there’s smoke, there’s fire, right? We gotta dig deeper, yall. Can’t just bury this under the rug or dismiss as fake news. Just sayin’.
Why even bother? It’s already been seen. All this does is make things look worse.
No a paywall, but I’m not able to get past their email requirement.
They only surprise here is that the photo was published in the original release. Someone’s losing his job
They missed his name in one of them (last page), it’s as disgusting as you imagine.
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
So files not only massively redacted…but now appearing to be doctored. Some serious questions need to be asked.
Why is no one talking about the passage of trump having sex with a woman at Epstein mansion and bruising her nipples?
Cuz it’s all a cover up! Even in the media!
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf (last page)
Say it with me now:
Streisand Effect!
As if anybody is shocked..
Trump is not a victim put them back in stop defending this sick pedophile
You can’t trust this administration with anything. They are the true swamp.
Woah, woah, Epstein docs getting a MAGA cleanup pass is wild. This whole thing reeks.
Photo? As in singular? We all know it’s way more than that.
Ah, there’s the double-speak, diversionary headline.
Now, when there are legitimate complaints that Trump was removed from the Epstein files (which he absolutely has been), they can just point to this and say “They only removed one picture, that picture was nothing incriminating, and it was removed to protect a victim.”
Yet more proof of old dangly orange being a pedo! A disgusting individual!
And they added a picture of Clinton and Michael Jackson- that supposedly wasn’t in the government Epstein files because they pulled it off public records.
Wouldn’t this constitute “destruction of evidence”?
>18 U.S. Code § 1519 – Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Oh wow, No way!
Does this mean that all of the photos and documents in the desk drawer are part of the evidence that needs to be released?
This gets better and better! We now have proof that the MAGAT regime is hiding files.
Bruh we knew they were scrubbing the files, that’s what took so long. The number of victims vs the number of people charged is wildly suspect as well…
Bump because Justice…and Democracy
On the plus side this executive branch is exceedingly bad at execution.
Wouldn’t it be ironic that the omission actually brings MORE attention to Trump?