At best, he doesn’t want many months of this staying prominent in the news cycle. At worst, he doesn’t want many months of this staying in the news cycle *and* he’s worried about the government failures that will come out.
zutonofgoth on
A lot of people calling for a Royal Commission. I suspect no one agrees on the “terms of reference”.
death-of-humanity on
>As calls grow for a Bondi royal commission, do Albanese’s arguments stand up?
Short answer, yes.
I also think a royal commission will expose groups within the Australian Jewish community with connections to the IDF, which will only inflame this situation further.
This faux-outrage regarding a royal commission is there solely to curb criticism of Israel, not to protect Australians.
Rizza1122 on
Well if the sub is gonna ban all words not much point having the sub.
qualitystreet on
“Whealy, who serves as chair of the Centre for Public Integrity, believes the Richardson review, in conjunction with a well-designed NSW inquiry, is an appropriate approach.”
5 Comments
At best, he doesn’t want many months of this staying prominent in the news cycle. At worst, he doesn’t want many months of this staying in the news cycle *and* he’s worried about the government failures that will come out.
A lot of people calling for a Royal Commission. I suspect no one agrees on the “terms of reference”.
>As calls grow for a Bondi royal commission, do Albanese’s arguments stand up?
Short answer, yes.
I also think a royal commission will expose groups within the Australian Jewish community with connections to the IDF, which will only inflame this situation further.
This faux-outrage regarding a royal commission is there solely to curb criticism of Israel, not to protect Australians.
Well if the sub is gonna ban all words not much point having the sub.
“Whealy, who serves as chair of the Centre for Public Integrity, believes the Richardson review, in conjunction with a well-designed NSW inquiry, is an appropriate approach.”