Almost as if they want a… gun free zone? The same kind that they scream serves no purpose for schools?
TintedApostle on
What happened to suing cities for having gun control laws? Oh right – they shift positions to obtain goals.
AINonsense on
Bu–bu–but muh seckind ermindmuntzzsiz!!
How are me and my good buddies in our well-regulated militia gon de-fend ourselves from the overreaching ravages of a malign state or standing armeeaee?
InformativeXP on
They realized they pissed off the right leaning gun owners now and are scared they may come to DC
Zealousideal_Look275 on
I thought this was the only Amendment they like, o well
city_dwellerZ on
The gun control debate, the abortion debate all these issues were never about them. It was about dividing the American people so they could drive right up the middle and grab power.
These are small potatoes to what they’re really after. And it just comes down to one word: greed.
AINonsense on
No, no, no, no no, no noooo.
That *can’t* be right. It’s the *Democrats* who want to come to take away my guns. Everybody told me that, from the preacher all the way up to the Pedo Piggy no-clothes emperor Cunniligula his own self!
mok000 on
Fascist regimes really don’t want citizens to have guns, it’s always been a misunderstanding by the gun-crowd that they would be favoured by Trumpists once they got into power.
Connect_Cut_8928 on
This isn’t about safety, it’s about control and liability. D.C. doesn’t want the legal or political cost of out-of-state firearms, so they crank up the penalties until people self-exclude.
The incentive is power with minimal effort. Scare enough people off and enforcement gets cheaper, cleaner, and quieter.
SuperstitiousPigeon5 on
Hold up, what about the members of congress who refused to go through the metal detectors in the Capitol building. The ones who were defiantly open carrying because of the 2A?
olmnknt on
But I thought the only way to stop a bad guy with guns was with good guys with guns?
OldFort27 on
Republicans now love gun control?
sexisfun1986 on
Post this almost every day now.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
Frank Wilhoit
AirGoat23 on
What hypocrisy. And all the while Republicans accuse Democrats of going after the guns of lawful carriers.
DJ_Vasquezz on
Never seen a group quicker to abandon their core principles than the GOP
francois_du_nord on
But the last people who did that got pardons????
SaturnsClubhouse on
This is why it bothers me when people treat Republicans beliefs as if they actually believe in them.
Available_Usual_9731 on
So… Selectively repealing the second amendment?
jojammin on
I don’t think this dumb bitch could pass the bar. See District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
mschreiber1 on
She means liberals who travel to DC with a legal firearm
Dingomoondance on
She knows what’s coming, don’t worry sweetheart, you’ll get a cyanide pill in the bunker to chomp on too
AdHopeful3801 on
But then how are the Proud Boys gonna storm the Capitol in January 2029?
skredditt on
The Epstein class is starting to feel afraid as they should be.
robcwag on
Janine Pinot Grigio is in the running for being the most incompetent attorney in the world.
CMG30 on
Ok, 2nd amendment single issue voters: the rubber has met the road. Your guys are taking away your guns. Are you going to continue to vote for them?
Dseltzer1313 on
Where’s the NRA now?
HistoricalWalrus5767 on
The Republicans are coming for your guns, y’all. They aren’t even trying to hide it.
McNuttyNutz on
They coming for your guns lol
ddiggler2469 on
*unless you’re “protesting” a “stolen” election
Alive_Antelope6217 on
So DC can’t have guns but schools should have armed teachers? Wat
fistswityat0es on
2A homers should LITERALLY be up in arms on this… but they won’t bc they’re all full of shit.
Open_Mortgage_4645 on
Where’s the NRA and Gun Owners of America and all the gun advocates? Their complete silence as Trump engages in behavior that’s antithetical to their stated agenda is proof that they have no principles, and their so called advocacy only applies when the perpetrating leaders are Democrats. They’ve completely discredited their organizations as far as I’m concerned as this proves it’s nothing but a partisan sham.
dantevsninjas on
The “liberals are going to take your guns” crowd is awfully silent.
Jerk182 on
Putin’s playbook. We are dealing with the Russian Mafia here and Trump’s their man in the US.
cutielikethat on
“Bring a gun into DC? Count on jail.” That’s the message from one of Trump’s own appointees, and the gun-rights crowd is livid because it directly contradicts their “absolute rights” talking points.
you_dont_know_me27 on
Is she suggesting a statute of limitations on this new law that she’s trying to enforce? Because I remember a time when a bunch of people came to D.C. with firearms and I don’t think the pardons covered this….
Criticaltundra777 on
And it begins. A federal prosecutor threatening arrest of legal gun owners. There goes the second amendment.
lemons714 on
Judge Box o wine is a blathering disgrace and a pathetic syncophant, bootlicker. In this case, DC does not have reciprocity for concealed carry, so, unless I am wrong, this is not a change.
* assuming she was saying if one carried in without obtaining a DC permit.
** I happen to know, as a former resident of NYC (and licensed CCW when I was there), that it is a scary place to even transit as an out-of-state gun owner. One needs to be very careful to know the laws of any state/district/city they travel to.
Still, FK that drunk hack.
supercali45 on
what about the J6 guys?
Keldrabitches on
Just when you thought republicans couldn’t do irony
DFu4ever on
“Hey NRA…”
*Points at this shit.*
pasta2666 on
Well she is an alcoholic. We should listen to her.
498432 on
The time has come when the government will take your guns and your second amendment. Sponsored by the Trump administration
43 Comments
Almost as if they want a… gun free zone? The same kind that they scream serves no purpose for schools?
What happened to suing cities for having gun control laws? Oh right – they shift positions to obtain goals.
Bu–bu–but muh seckind ermindmuntzzsiz!!
How are me and my good buddies in our well-regulated militia gon de-fend ourselves from the overreaching ravages of a malign state or standing armeeaee?
They realized they pissed off the right leaning gun owners now and are scared they may come to DC
I thought this was the only Amendment they like, o well
The gun control debate, the abortion debate all these issues were never about them. It was about dividing the American people so they could drive right up the middle and grab power.
These are small potatoes to what they’re really after. And it just comes down to one word: greed.
No, no, no, no no, no noooo.
That *can’t* be right. It’s the *Democrats* who want to come to take away my guns. Everybody told me that, from the preacher all the way up to the Pedo Piggy no-clothes emperor Cunniligula his own self!
Fascist regimes really don’t want citizens to have guns, it’s always been a misunderstanding by the gun-crowd that they would be favoured by Trumpists once they got into power.
This isn’t about safety, it’s about control and liability. D.C. doesn’t want the legal or political cost of out-of-state firearms, so they crank up the penalties until people self-exclude.
The incentive is power with minimal effort. Scare enough people off and enforcement gets cheaper, cleaner, and quieter.
Hold up, what about the members of congress who refused to go through the metal detectors in the Capitol building. The ones who were defiantly open carrying because of the 2A?
But I thought the only way to stop a bad guy with guns was with good guys with guns?
Republicans now love gun control?
Post this almost every day now.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
Frank Wilhoit
What hypocrisy. And all the while Republicans accuse Democrats of going after the guns of lawful carriers.
Never seen a group quicker to abandon their core principles than the GOP
But the last people who did that got pardons????
This is why it bothers me when people treat Republicans beliefs as if they actually believe in them.
So… Selectively repealing the second amendment?
I don’t think this dumb bitch could pass the bar. See District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
She means liberals who travel to DC with a legal firearm
She knows what’s coming, don’t worry sweetheart, you’ll get a cyanide pill in the bunker to chomp on too
But then how are the Proud Boys gonna storm the Capitol in January 2029?
The Epstein class is starting to feel afraid as they should be.
Janine Pinot Grigio is in the running for being the most incompetent attorney in the world.
Ok, 2nd amendment single issue voters: the rubber has met the road. Your guys are taking away your guns. Are you going to continue to vote for them?
Where’s the NRA now?
The Republicans are coming for your guns, y’all. They aren’t even trying to hide it.
They coming for your guns lol
*unless you’re “protesting” a “stolen” election
So DC can’t have guns but schools should have armed teachers? Wat
2A homers should LITERALLY be up in arms on this… but they won’t bc they’re all full of shit.
Where’s the NRA and Gun Owners of America and all the gun advocates? Their complete silence as Trump engages in behavior that’s antithetical to their stated agenda is proof that they have no principles, and their so called advocacy only applies when the perpetrating leaders are Democrats. They’ve completely discredited their organizations as far as I’m concerned as this proves it’s nothing but a partisan sham.
The “liberals are going to take your guns” crowd is awfully silent.
Putin’s playbook. We are dealing with the Russian Mafia here and Trump’s their man in the US.
“Bring a gun into DC? Count on jail.” That’s the message from one of Trump’s own appointees, and the gun-rights crowd is livid because it directly contradicts their “absolute rights” talking points.
Is she suggesting a statute of limitations on this new law that she’s trying to enforce? Because I remember a time when a bunch of people came to D.C. with firearms and I don’t think the pardons covered this….
And it begins. A federal prosecutor threatening arrest of legal gun owners. There goes the second amendment.
Judge Box o wine is a blathering disgrace and a pathetic syncophant, bootlicker. In this case, DC does not have reciprocity for concealed carry, so, unless I am wrong, this is not a change.
* assuming she was saying if one carried in without obtaining a DC permit.
** I happen to know, as a former resident of NYC (and licensed CCW when I was there), that it is a scary place to even transit as an out-of-state gun owner. One needs to be very careful to know the laws of any state/district/city they travel to.
Still, FK that drunk hack.
what about the J6 guys?
Just when you thought republicans couldn’t do irony
“Hey NRA…”
*Points at this shit.*
Well she is an alcoholic. We should listen to her.
The time has come when the government will take your guns and your second amendment. Sponsored by the Trump administration