Share.

2 Comments

  1. simon_ritchie2000 on

    From Bloomberg (gift link above):

    “For decades, fossil-fuel companies and their climate-change-denying allies obsessively tried to kill the federal government’s right to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions. Like Ahab, they may find that finally harpooning their white whale risks taking them down with it.

    “Last week, President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency [retracted](https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-02-11/the-insurance-crisis-is-about-to-get-even-worse?srnd=undefined) its 2009 finding that greenhouse gases are dangerous to human health. In the byzantine scaffolding of US regulatory law, this “endangerment finding” means the EPA must regulate those planet-heating gases under the 1963 Clean Air Act. By inviting EPA restrictions, the finding has been anathema to fossil-fuel companies and the handful of ideologues in the White House driving the effort to rescind it.

    “But the status quo also protects fossil fuels in a way. States can’t sue or regulate us, the industry says, because the federal government already has that job, thanks to the endangerment finding. Do away with the finding, and you do away with that protection.

    “The timing couldn’t be more awkward for fossil fuels: In response to Trump’s [crusade](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-opinion-trump-climate-rollback/?srnd=undefined) against federal climate action, state and local policymakers are increasingly taking action against the industry in court. One ideal scenario could be landing a huge settlement like the one they imposed on Big Tobacco in the 1990s.”

  2. That gives Trump more power over the oil companies and the billionaires that own them. That’s what Trump wants is for them to bow down to him and his rules. They paid money for his campaign and he wants power back.

Leave A Reply