Share.

35 Comments

  1. As if he was ever really into honoring “deals”.

    I hope it just screams out to the world: Do not trust this ‘president’.

  2. bickering_fool on

    He crippled himself…he was operating outside his jurisdiction. He owns it…nobody else.

  3. No_Succotash890 on

    Bahahahahhhah Fortune your narrative couldn’t be any more compromised! Who posted this shit?

  4. Many folks screamed from the rafters this was going to be an issue in the first place. No country is going to negotiate under duress or in partner negotiating in bad faith. Those 90 deals in 90 days weren’t going to happen, and certainly not going to hold if any happen.

  5. Apprehensive_Idea758 on

    I’m glad that the U.S. Supreme Court had the balls to stand up to that narcissitic, shitgoblin and finaly tell him no.

  6. “Trump will no longer be able to collect much of the loot he has extorted”: How the Supreme Court Disarmed America’s Thug-In-Chief

  7. Wrong_Confection1090 on

    “Negotiator in Chief” my entire hairy ass. He’s a dementia-ridden old man who’s being puppeted by a collection of the most rancid sentient dick cheese to ever congeal. He barely knows where he is most of the time and his “tactics” are literally against the law.

  8. What deals has he actually negotiated? All he did was metaphorically put his balls on the table and ask why no one wants to fondle them.

  9. Well, dude shouldn’t have based his whole strategy on an unconstitutional and unprecedented power grab. That’s what, you know, good leaders do.

  10. Negotiator in chief? Cutting deals?

    Is that what we’re calling an emotionally unstable manchild with impulsive shifting of the goal posts?

  11. Attention dumbdumbs: it was all bluster, like everything else. Like how he literally demolishing the east wing of the White House without an actual architectural plan. There were no “deals”. No frameworks, nothing concrete. just all hot air, like everything else.

  12. Dismal_Thanks_5849 on

    Maybe he shouldn’t have used made up powers to negotiate. If these deals are so great, he should have no problem getting Congress to approve them.

  13. Ornery-Ticket834 on

    He crippled himself by willfully ignoring the laws and common sense. That’s how idiots behave.

  14. the supreme court asbolutely *didn’t* do that. The law, which already plainly made the tariffs illegal, did. The republicans allowed Trump to *break* the law for a year, and the Supreme court declined to *change* the law. Not allowing Trump to break the law is not the same as “crippling” him unless he’s ineffective within the structure of the law

  15. What a shitty headline.

    1. You can’t cripple an ability he never had, which leads to

    2. He was never going to honor them.  His “master negatiator” tactic has always been to get what he wants first, and then not honor his side and make it impossible to hold him accountable for it.

    “Art of the Deal” has always been plain theft.

  16. The Supreme Court didn’t “do” anything to him.

    He blatantly violated the Constitution and based his entire economic program around a strategy that was obviously illegal.

    The Supreme Court ruling that he violated the Constitution didn’t do anything that shouldn’t have been expected.

    Upholding the law isn’t crippling him. He’s crippling himself by basing his plans around the idea that he can do absolutely anything he wants, no matter how illegal.

  17. U know it’s billionaire bootlicker media when it blames anybody except the toddler in chief for his own actions. A Genuine fuck you to Nick Lichtenberg for framing the piece this way.

  18. What a shitty headline. It’s called *checks and balances.* What Trump was doing was not legal.

  19. He exceeded his power as the president and ignored Congress who has the authority. Shame on Congress for not stopping him. Shame on the Supreme Court for giving the president more power than he is entitled to.

Leave A Reply