Share.

26 Comments

  1. Don’t see how such things fall within the purview of the Department of Jeffrey. I thought they were about orchestrating the cover-up on behalf of the Epstein class?

    Man, they got their hands full

  2. FarImprovement2840 on

    Are we about to find out how there was transgender ideology (their words from a previous shooting) carved into the bullets too?

    Not a single reason to trust anything from the DOJ

  3. Well, isn’t that the real reason for the 2nd amendment? To protect the masses from a tyrant.

  4. The DoJ is untrustworthy. Anything they say needs corroborating evidence or it should be deemed untrue.

    At least that’s what the US courts do.

  5. I mean…… I understand the sentiment. But for the very same reason I don’t trust the assholes reporting this.

  6. Sorry DOJ, you’re on the take and a disgrace to the United States now.

    Anyways I’m sure MAGA agrees that we shouldn’t trust anything we don’t personally see and hear, and that is independently verified by another source, after fact checking their vision and hearing with accredited medical staff that have been fully vetted and personally interviewed to assure non-bias in their testing methodology and business practices, cross-referenced with any ethical complaints, and the voracity of such claims.

  7. wewantedthefunk on

    The same DoJ that blatantly lies about shootings and manufactured evidence to support their view? Like finding shell casings covered in sharpie messages they “found”? That DoJ? I wouldn’t buy their story at Temu prices.

  8. they labeled Rene Good and Alex Pretti as *Domestic Terrorists* without a shred of evidence before their bodies were even cold. so excuse me if i don’t trust a single goddamn thing they say.

  9. anemic_royaltea on

    Weird how QAnon spent years and years pumping up people’s paranoia and anger about a cabal of pedophiles and then when all their valiant crusaders are in the halls of power and turn out to be the pedophile protection party a bunch of these freaks get violent?

  10. I don’t condone or celebrate political violence but if I was standing between that guy and That Guy I’d suddenly find something interesting to look at over that way.

  11. If Klan Blondie told me the sky was blue, I’d walknoutside to make sure. Nothing the DOJ says can be taken at face, or any other, value.

  12. Visible_Fact_8706 on

    The 2nd amendment was intended to be used against tyrannical government, yes.

    I’m not even American and I swear I know more about the constitution than these jabronis.

  13. A 2nd Amendment person taking care of a problematic politician? Who have I heard calling for that? Oh, wait…

  14. What in the fuck else is the 2nd amendment for if not murdering pedophiles when a corrupt government shields them from justice?

    Either the second amendment exists and it’s legal for citizens to use guns to free themselves from tyrranical government, or it’s not and we should just ban all guns. 

    It cannot be both. 

Leave A Reply