Share.

19 Comments

  1. Crazy-Intention8802 on

    Iran misunderstood the US government thinking that it actually cares about it’s people opinions..but now they understood US government is just like iranian government never cared about people as both government only cares about what israel does..rather than for their people

  2. The Great American Self Infliction of the 21st century will be studied for a long time.

    No one was has done more harm to the country then themselves. 

  3. NoReserve7293 on

    Intentionally cruel is the very definition of the child rapist President of the United States of America. Totally absent of empathy, integrity or decency.

  4. SamLeCoyote_Fix_1 on

    Absolutely shameful. We are literally funding our own economic ruin at the pump. Unbelievable.

  5. esqtepicaelculo on

    What about all that oil we got from Venezuela?!?! Shouldnt that new supply of oil keep prices down? Didn’t we take back Venezuela so American companies can have their stakes back and produce more oil? Oh right, we did all that but it is NOT to be edit the American people.

  6. HairAncient5500 on

    WE DO NOT GET OIL FROM IRAN. This strike won’t increase oil prices. What we do use is the straight of Hormuz which Iran is trying with some success to close. That’s what’s affecting prices. Not this.

  7. AdmirableSwim5838 on

    Yes — there were credible reports in February 2026 that Iran was close to finalizing a deal with China for supersonic anti-ship missiles. But it’s important to understand what kind of missiles they were and why they mattered so much.

    1. What the China–Iran missile deal was about

    Iran was reportedly negotiating to buy Chinese CM-302 supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles. 

    Key characteristics:
    • Speed: about Mach 3–3.5 (supersonic)
    • Range: roughly 290 km (180 miles)
    • Type: anti-ship cruise missile
    • Purpose: designed to hit large naval vessels such as destroyers or aircraft carriers
    • Flight profile: sea-skimming and maneuvering to avoid radar and interception 

    These missiles are the export version of China’s YJ-12, one of the faster anti-ship missiles currently on the market.

    Analysts called it a potential “game changer” for naval warfare in the Persian Gulf because of how hard these missiles are to intercept. 

    2. Why this mattered to the GCC (Saudi, UAE, Qatar, etc.)

    For Gulf states, the main fear wasn’t land attack — it was control of the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

    If Iran had deployed these missiles along its coast:

    They could threaten shipping lanes

    About 20–30% of global oil and LNG passes through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Supersonic anti-ship missiles positioned on Iran’s coast could:
    • Target oil tankers
    • Hit LNG carriers leaving Qatar
    • Threaten naval escorts protecting shipping

    That could mean:
    • Oil prices spiking globally
    • Insurance companies refusing to insure ships
    • Gulf exports slowing or stopping

    They could target GCC navies

    The GCC fleets (Saudi, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar) are relatively small.

    Supersonic missiles:
    • Reduce reaction time dramatically
    • Could overwhelm ship defenses if launched in salvos

    That’s why Gulf countries invest heavily in Patriot, THAAD, and naval missile defense.

    3. Why the United States was concerned

    The biggest strategic implication was for U.S. aircraft carriers and naval forces in the Gulf.

    The U.S. Navy relies on carriers operating in the region.

    Supersonic anti-ship missiles:
    • Travel 3–4× the speed of sound
    • Can strike in minutes
    • Are much harder to intercept than subsonic missiles

    If Iran had dozens of them along the coast:
    • A carrier strike group would have to operate farther from Iran
    • The Strait of Hormuz could become a high-risk combat zone
    • U.S. naval dominance in the Gulf would be challenged

    4. The bigger geopolitical meaning

    The deal also had strategic symbolism:

    It would signal:
    • China arming Iran more openly
    • Iran moving deeper into the China–Russia security orbit
    • Weakening of U.S. sanctions enforcement

    It also would have violated or stretched existing UN arms restrictions. 

    5. Why this matters in the current situation

    The recent conflict has already shown how missiles change the balance.

    Iran has launched large missile and drone barrages against regional states, hitting infrastructure and threatening shipping lanes. 

    If they also had large numbers of Chinese supersonic anti-ship missiles, the Gulf could become extremely dangerous for:
    • U.S. naval forces
    • Gulf oil exports
    • International shipping

    💡 In plain terms:
    Those missiles would have given Iran a much stronger ability to deny access to the Persian Gulf, threatening oil routes and U.S. carriers — which is why Washington and the Gulf states were watching that deal very closely.

  8. Hey Trump voters, this is your fault, you’re going to fight in the Iran war, right?

  9. Also our tax dollars being used to destroy finite resources and wreck the climate. 

  10. Similar-Dance-3867 on

    Iran can stop the commercial shipping lanes with drones easily, unless the US and Israel occupy their coast lines. Trump now faces a tough choice, boot on the ground?

  11. MidWestKhagan on

    Amerisrael making everything worse so the baby eating pedophilic elite can get their money?! Oh my God I’m shocked! Shocked I tell you! /s

  12. this_my_sportsreddit on

    Republicans do not care. Sure, they would prefer gas prices be lower but if this is the necessary trade-off in order to make the lives of the blacks, the browns, and the gays worse, they will happily absorb it or likelier, just shift blame to obama/biden/hilary. Folks need to realize that they voted for trump to hurt the people they consider outsiders. Thats it. As long as he is doing that, they are happy.

  13. The spice must flow. Baron Harkkonen should have had a better plan. This will cost him Arrakis.

Leave A Reply