Share.

25 Comments

  1. Oh, and on what grounds? Defamation of a country? Countries have no standing to sue for such torts.

    Or are they suing in an Israeli court? NYT can tell them to go get fucked.

  2. Fluid_Drummer1665 on

    The “dog rape” story is as ridiculous as it is entirely uncorroborated.

  3. LemurianLemurLad on

    Can you defame a whole country? Interesting idea, but it seems unlikely to succeed as a concept.

    Discovery will be interesting. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation, if this article is correct and claims “were corroborated with other witnesses, whenever possible, and with people the victims confided in – that includes family members and lawyers”, it seems unlikely to move forward at all.

    This is basically just bluster, and functionally probably a SLAPP case.

    Edit: fixed spelling on SLAPP. Stupid autocorrect.

  4. They’re taking the trump route and sue … but people know it’s real , that’s why they scare them with “I’m suing you”

  5. And rightfully so, the dog rape is completely unfounded, lacks any evidence and was just published as if it’s fact. NYT published a modern blood libel.

  6. dennis-w220 on

    Didn’t they fire a female prosecutor who decided to whistleblow a horrendous incident? The suspect was not convicted and the prosecutor was fired.

  7. OptimisticSkeleton on

    Discovery on this one is gonna be like an orbital strike on Israel.

  8. GayGeekInLeather on

    Can a country even bring a defamation/libel lawsuit against a newspaper?

  9. How much longer will Netanyahu be in office? Israel’s reputation has gone down the drain, they used to say “oh oops did we do another war crime? We’ll do an internal investigation” and now it’s like “talking about our crimes is blood libel”.

  10. Im_not_an_admin on

    Just fuck off Israel. Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, other than people you pay off, and your own shitty inhabitants like, respect, or give a solitary fuck about your existence anymore.

  11. TheComplimentarian on

    I’m amazed the NYT managed to print something Israel didn’t approve of…That’s bound to be a sign of some wheels coming off somewhere.

  12. This is when you know it’s 100% true.

    Straight out of the Trumpf playbook.

  13. captain_decaption on

    The last point in the article omits an important detail, which is that the NYT retracted some of the claims that Israel considered bringing a lawsuit over the last time. Of course the Guardian’s coverage of this is pretty biased, since the Guardian made similar claims, like having mathematical proof of starvation, set to the same profoundly disingenuous imagery of otherwise ill children.

  14. If the NYT cannot sue Israel due to sovereign immunity, then Israel should not be able to sue the NYT.

    Israel should be required to permanently waive sovereign immunity as a condition to be able to bring civil suit against a private party in US courts

Leave A Reply