Share.

34 Comments

  1. Wonder what the target was, another random civillian condo or were they actually trying to hit something this time?

    Edit: holy shit each is around 40 million dollars, are the targets really worth more than that?

  2. shortsharpshock1 on

    well, just like they said. hopefully no casualties. and hopefully Ukraine takes out Russia’s Oreshnik production soon

  3. How often have these types of attacks been happening? This seems bigger than usual but I haven’t been paying as much attention as I want lately #fuckcancer

  4. Big Russian attack on Kyiv is underway right now, Shaheds Kinzhals and Oreshnik too

  5. Looks like debris. Fragmented reentry at subsonic speeds, no detonation…

    Puten is throwing rocks again…

  6. fortuna_audaci on

    I see as a positive sign with unfortunate consequences. The more desperate the Russians get, the more they are going to lash out.

  7. CaptainFit9727 on

    And I was thinking what was that loud stuff… Just imagine how  much money they wasted just to send concrete dummies in Kyiv…

  8. Can some explain what we are seeing? Are those individual “warheads” from a single missile?

  9. CitraNelsonMosaic on

    Fucking. Scumbag. Terrorists.

    **Слава Україні! Нехай Бог тебе оберігає**

  10. TyrannosauRSX on

    Hope to see the Kremlin burning in the next 24-48 hours in response. Fucking, terrorists.

  11. I’m no missile expert but do these look slower than the previous oreshnik missiles?

  12. Affectionate_Fun_106 on

    No lightning or nothing when it hit seems like fake or something else, maybe ukraine shoot it down.

  13. Is there no detentions on the ground? Theres 1 at the start but looks like its from somewhere off camera.

  14. Superb-Wonder-1896 on

    awesome, it means that Putin is shitting his pants after the last drone strikes

  15. If confirmed, this would be the second documented Oreshnik strike since the system was first used publicly on Dnipro back in November. Russia’s been sitting on this capability for months, which suggests they’re treating it more as an escalation signal than a regular operational tool. The cost per missile likely north of $30-40 million means they’re not going to spam these at random apartment blocks. When they fire it at Kyiv alongside cheaper systems like Shaheds, it’s about message-sending, not target destruction efficiency. We tracked the November strike at panopsik.com and flagged at the time that the real question wasn’t the weapon itself but how often Putin would actually authorize its use. Two strikes in four months tells you something about the threshold.

  16. Mostly a ridiculous attempt at intimidation. These are ICBMs with little or no conventional payload so minimal damage inflicted.

  17. Is the resumption of Oreshnik use correlated to the lack of Patriot interceptors in Ukrainian inventories?

  18. Were there explosions? I don’t see any. Maybe it’s like last time they fired off an Oreshnik, just empty rockets to show again that they have this capability. More saber rattling.

  19. thatBOOMBOOMguy on

    What’s the point of wasting $40m missile without a clear target nor being loaded with nuclear warheads? Was the point just to scare with a possible nuclear launch? I don’t get it.

  20. really_knobee on

    Yeah, we got hit with all sorts of shit this morning.  

    I have some audio… It was wild.

  21. the russians want to say that ‘this missile could have had a nuclear warhead if we wanted and Ukraine cant stop it’

  22. toxic-chanka on

    From all the videos released so far this appears to be a purely kinetic strike. We would see/hear much larger impacts if they were carrying a payload.

    Moscow is losing support among Russians because of Ukraine’s deep strike campaigns. They need something to put on Kremlin TV to show that they’re “winning”

Leave A Reply