>Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, Bill C-22’s sponsor, told reporters on Wednesday he’ll propose amendments to better safeguard encryption and clarify what metadata has to be stored by tech and telecommunication companies — but remained firm the bill would become law.
Let’s see these amendments. I have little faith in Gary and public safety.
If anything this entire bill should be trashed.
Edit: to the person who responded to me then promptly blocked me / deleted their comments saying we’re a country without lawful access, you bought in the media hype. The rcmp and government CAN get this info, they just have to use the correct channels (ie petition a court). It’s blazenly partisan to defend this because it’s your party. The reality is, it’s bad all the way around.
PaloAltoPremium on
The same Anadasangaree that up until a few weeks ago was fervently defending this bill (even though it didn’t seem like he generally understood it), and claiming that opposition to it was “misinformation”.
The same Gov’t that stressed the law was proportionate and was nothing to worry about as it had “judicial oversight”?
The same PMO that “categorically rejects claims that Bill C-22 would enable the surveillance of Canadians through everyday devices”?
2 Comments
>Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, Bill C-22’s sponsor, told reporters on Wednesday he’ll propose amendments to better safeguard encryption and clarify what metadata has to be stored by tech and telecommunication companies — but remained firm the bill would become law.
Let’s see these amendments. I have little faith in Gary and public safety.
If anything this entire bill should be trashed.
Edit: to the person who responded to me then promptly blocked me / deleted their comments saying we’re a country without lawful access, you bought in the media hype. The rcmp and government CAN get this info, they just have to use the correct channels (ie petition a court). It’s blazenly partisan to defend this because it’s your party. The reality is, it’s bad all the way around.
The same Anadasangaree that up until a few weeks ago was fervently defending this bill (even though it didn’t seem like he generally understood it), and claiming that opposition to it was “misinformation”.
The same Gov’t that stressed the law was proportionate and was nothing to worry about as it had “judicial oversight”?
The same PMO that “categorically rejects claims that Bill C-22 would enable the surveillance of Canadians through everyday devices”?