Share.

47 Comments

  1. black_flag_4ever on

    Why in the fuck would he want to resurrect this scandal? I can’t even believe this is 2026.

  2. Thatrebornincognito on

    Good news. They are making sure that she can get a big chunk of that slush fund they are establishing for victims of political prosecution.

  3. OkayButFoRealz on

    The obvious complete weaponization of the DOJ is just another reminder of what reforms need to be codified. The fact he’s even *able* to use the DOJ as his own personal attack/defend dog is just disgusting, and another example of how vulnerable our system was to someone that breaks all the rules.

  4. hamsterfolly on

    What is weaponization of the DOJ? I’ll take Trump Projections for $800, Ken!

  5. fencerofminerva on

    Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.

    That word is “Nazi.” Nobody cares about their motives anymore.

    They joined what they joined. They lent their support and their moral approval. And, in so doing, they bound themselves to everything that came after. Who cares any more what particular knot they used in the binding?

    A.R. Moxon

  6. Electrical-Law-5731 on

    The whole government is being weaponized against the American people. This is only going to end with a lot of violence. We are being slaughtered by the government. It is time the people in charge start feeling some of the pain.

  7. This is simply AWFUL! Harassing the victim, stress, financially, personally, is there no end to evilness?!

  8. Even if the President cannot be arrested according to the Supreme Court, giving him absolute immunity (absolutely insane); that immunity only applies to the President himself, personally — not the entire executive.

    So Democrats should be making lists of people that are following these illegal orders and they should be subject to prosecution.

  9. whycantigetwhatiwant on

    She’s not an accuser. The accusations were found to be true and he’s been adjudicated to have done the things she “accused” him of.

  10. 1970s_MonkeyKing on

    And yet… Our Supreme Court and Congress are just allowing this to happen. Why don’t the Dems just walk out? Why don’t the Justices walk out?

  11. Starscream147 on

    This is beyond unamerican.

    By god, friends, even I know that.

    It all is. However. This is unbelievable.

  12. This has already been settled in court. So funny. Now she can tap some cash from the new fund.

  13. Just the thing Trump wants back in the news. These fucks can’t even do corruption right.

  14. They’re trying to bankrupt her out of spite if/when she hires defense lawyers. It doesn’t even matter if there are no real charges.

  15. Wasn’t Trump literally ordered by a court to stop saying she lied because it was harassment?

    I mean, not that any of that matters for him. He never faces consequences. Add it to the pile I guess

  16. Known_Leek8997 on

    She’s not an “accuser”. They found him guilty that would make her a “victim”. 

  17. The definition of criminal in the United States has turned into “anybody who has or is thinking about going against Trump and his gang of goonies”

  18. Watchhistory on

    Again and again and again and again and again.

    Epstein Files ain’t going away.

    thiefinchief still guilty.

  19. Thisisgotham on

    If we’re paying for useless endeavors, I think we need a DOJ investigation into why the animals in Trump’s cognitive test stories keep changing. It’s an elephant, then it’s a squirrel, then it’s a horse?

  20. Motor_Somewhere7565 on

    So the man found liable for sexually abusing this woman is not only elected President TWICE but keeps appealing, so he doesn’t have to pay damages and is now having her investigated. This is how screwed up we are as a country, amongst many, many screwed up things.

  21. Trump is a rapist. Women, children, and (possibly?) men/boys. No amount of court cases with change that.

  22. I hope that she is charged. Then she would have the right to subpoena Trump and have him testify under oath.

    But, we all know that he will do anything to not have to so this is all a smokescreen to distract from the Iran war and the Epstein files.

  23. slowdaygames on

    Judge of the civil case should continue to increase the defamation award for every week it remains unpaid.

  24. Open_Mortgage_4645 on

    This is beyond disgusting. Using the power of government to persecute Trump’s adjudicated rape victim is beyond the pale. This is truly a new low.

  25. Every accusation is a confession. The republicans are never honest brokers and will always accuse others of what they’re doing. Nuts.

  26. Apprehensive-Care20z on

    does she get the full 1.7 billion from the ‘political target’ fund?

  27. What are they gonna do? Charge her for being raped by Donald J. Trump, the (child) rapist?

  28. Some-Poetry8420 on

    She’s not a “Trump accuser” though, she’s a “Trump victim”, as has been proven already in a court of law.

Leave A Reply