Share.

13 Comments

  1. There’s a whole lot of “think of the children” distracting from the fact that most adults also lack the skills to navigate social media responsibly. Critical thinking has never been more important, and we don’t really do anything to teach those skills.

  2. justtoaskthisq on

    There are kids that still smoke, and drink. Banning them from doing so is still the right thing to do.

    I agree that everyone should be taught to better interact with the internet, but not restricting access to social media and other tools from children is silly.

  3. DarkAdrenaline03 on

    We should hold social media companies accountable for what they show children in their algorithms. Minors should have a separate algorithm from adults.

  4. It’s a good point, except that I don’t know anyone who knows how to navigate responsibly nor a set of principles one could really teach that would achieve that.

    There are certain activities that just don’t seem, by observation and experience, to have a reasonable way to “teach” new entrants to the activity how to do it “responsibly”.

    I’m willing to consider it, but has the The Walrus considered that a “responsible internet navigation” education might be akin in scope and scale to, say, a driver’s license or a PAL, or an electrician’s license or even a hairdresser’s? The assumption seems to be that it can be laid at the feet of unregulated private home instruction, but I don’t know if that assumption is justified.

    It could be that a responsible education in the internet as envisioned would *overall* be more intrusive than a flat ban from the perspective of how much the government is interacting with the individual.

  5. Jazzlike_770 on

    With that argument, we should not put restrictions on alcohol and cigarettes and educate kids that those are harmful?

  6. KoreanSamgyupsal on

    I think we’re trying to solve this problem the wrong way. We should really be banning platforms that aren’t moderating their own content, it’s not about banning free speech but banning hateful or inciting violence ones.

    I grew up in the age of FaceBook and MSN being absolutely new. I remember the days of signing on and off to get your crush to notice you. I remember when you would write comments on people’s Facebook “wall”. Social Media used to be a place to connect.

    However, the landscape has changed and the content being pushed on the platforms are absolutely insane. There is porn and even violence that are being posted. Countless racist comments about immigration in Canada. The comments almost always look like bots. Twitter, everyone got a blue checkmark so you assume they’re real people with real comments when they’re not.

    I can get past places like 6ixBuzz and Rebel News posting bullshit but not when they’re promoting hateful and politically extreme discourse.

  7. thrilled_to_be_there on

    Aren’t we trying to prevent mass PTSD? The smartphone had enabled the constant bombardment of negativity, this is impacting everyone. At least the older pre-smartphone people are aware of the impact, our kids will not.

  8. This is like saying we should “gamble responsibly”. Gambling is never responsible, the house always wins.

    Children don’t have the brain development to manage the behaviours responsibly, hard enough for most adults.

  9. What kids (and adults) need is more connection and interaction with people in the real world.

    Expecting anyone to navigate the internet responsibly by themselves is not realistic. We are social creatures, we do not have that level of self regulation. 

  10. Scooter_McAwesome on

    It’s a strange world where instead of teaching children about something that’s dangerous, we block them from it entirely. Then when they reach adulthood they have no knowledge or experience to deal with that danger.

    The better solution would be for parents to actually parent their children. Sit with their kids while they use social media, explain about scams, strangers, privacy, manipulative algorithms etc. My 8yo can identify a scammer on Roblox every time. How do I know? Because I’m sitting right beside him and he tells me.

    The kids would be a lot better off if the adults in their lives spent more time with them.

  11. TantricBuildup on

    Dont downgrade the idea that we need to ban/restrict it at a certain age. You cant make everything “all or nothing” because we will never progress to a better state.

    Ban it, educate them, yes yes.. but also hold tech companies accountable – dont we have research showing the damage – what are they doing to fix it

  12. TrappedInLimbo on

    Unfortunately people are just painfully misinformed on this issue. Newly discovered negative effects that social media can have on kids do exist, but acting like that means it is universally bad for every kid in every context is just blatantly false and not what these studies or the people studying this have concluded. It’s like looking at the negative effects gaming can have on some kids in some contexts and deciding that we need to ban video games from them all.

  13. Justin_123456 on

    I don’t know why this is framed as an either or. We all agree that algorithmic media is an inherently addictive and harmful product, just like alcohol, cannabis and tobacco.

    With these products we do all 3 things.

    We regulate their content, and business practices to reduce harm.

    We do education campaigning because we recognize that even with fully prohibited substances people will still use them, and need to have the skills and knowledge to do so with reduced harms

    And we do age-gating, because we recognize that kids are particularly vulnerable and ill-prepared to navigate risky behaviour, and that even if your teen still gets a friend to buy them a bottle of booze, there is value in adding friction and official sanction.

    I don’t think we’d accept the argument that we couldn’t possibly check IDs to try and keep kids out of bars, and just do the alcohol awareness education instead. We wouldn’t say, as long as tobacco/nicotine products comply with plain packing laws, and put the cancer lung on the pack, kids should be able to buy them. They build on each other.

Leave A Reply