Share.

36 Comments

  1. NamelessResearcher on

    You know, it almost seems like he’s compensating for something with these massive balls.

  2. Those pictures are going straight into the history books (assuming we weather this) – you can’t ask for a better description of this administration

  3. literallytwisted on

    Can’t wait until Trashy Trump and his ballroom are both removed from our Whitehouse.

  4. The formal first ballroom use will have the King of Clowns wearing his fake gold crown and a white (orange?) powdered wig? Can’t wait for the image. Just kidding. Makes my stomach turn over just thinking about it.

  5. Still want to know why he is being allowed to alter the White House to this degree. Oh yeah, cause Congress is a bunch of pussies. Hopefully the ballroom meets the same fate as that wall theyre tearing down

  6. I still don’t understand how he is allowed to do all the crap he does. It is appalling.

  7. A_Swell_Gaytheist on

    Reminder that they claimed this doesn’t need National Capital Planning Commission review… even though the NCPC reviewed changes to the WH fence back in 2017.

    Insane they can just change the White House with no oversight or input

  8. AdorianTsepeshu on

    I’m old enough to remember when they wanted to impeach Obama for wearing the wrong colored suit.

  9. Wtf. Another Trump lie! He said the White House would not be touched while building his gaudy ballroom. I have no words for how angry I am.

  10. Negative_Gravitas on

    Fucking Caligula.

    Damn near 2000 years and millions of us still can’t recognize a petty, idiot, narcissist bitch when “we” see one

  11. My hope is that when the current administration is gone, the next democratic administration will reverse every single change he’s made. As though Donald Trump had never been there.

    Tear down the “ballroom”. Restore the rose garden. Remove all the gaudy gold trim from the Oval Office, et. al.

    Just remove ALL traces of this horrible administration from THE PEOPLE’S White House!

  12. Surprised such a thing isn’t protected under some kind of Heritage Building or Historical Monument status. Not that he would listen, but still.

  13. He’s building his ballroom over his underground emergency ops bunker, btw.

    Sure is a choice. Probably planning to lure heads of state and young girls down there from the parties upstairs.

  14. Let’s play a game. 

    What would the coverage on Fox News be if Barack Obama shut down the government, then brought in excavators to literally demolish the White House so he could build a giant ballroom to throw parties. 

    The rules are, you get an automatic zero if you don’t reference the rapper Common.

  15. Just how?

    I work in construction. Even private projects on private land with private financing don’t get off the ground this fast.

  16. He isn’t building a “ballroom”, what he’s building is The Trump House, aka the new presidential palace which will make any tin pot dictator jealous. Something along the lines of one of Saddam Husain places, he’ll tear down the rest of the WH in due course.

  17. It’s nice to see in such clear view the Administrations priorities.

    Important:

    – Construction of Trump’s ballroom

    Not Important:

    – Securing a budget deal to fund the government

  18. CosmicSerendipity on

    Desecrating The People’s House to feed the fragile ego of a malignant narcissist.

  19. VexedCanadian84 on

    If and when the next dem president wants to demolish this, Republicans are going to claim it’s s waste of money.

    Democrats should run on a platform of getting rid of anything with trump’s stench on it

  20. Hay_Fever_at_3_AM on

    >“It won’t interfere with the current building. It won’t be. It’ll be near it but not touching it — and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of,” Trump said during an executive order signing in July. “It’s my favorite. It’s my favorite place. I love it.”

  21. This shouldn’t be legal because the White House is technically owned by the public and is a historical and cultural landmark and should not be able to get modified without an act of Congress to also back it.

Leave A Reply