Share.

27 Comments

  1. The Pentagon is barring nearly all Defense Department personnel, including military commanders, from talking to Congress or state lawmakers unless they have received prior approval from the agency’s office of legislative affairs, according to a memo signed this month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and obtained by CNN.

    “Unauthorized engagements with Congress by [Defense Department] personnel acting in their official capacity, no matter how well-intentioned, may undermine Department-wide priorities critical to achieving our legislative objectives,” says the memo, which was obtained by CNN.

  2. PickleKnight004 on

    Uh, since when do we need ‘permission slips’ to chat within our own government? This isn’t middle school. 🙄

  3. People didn’t pay attention when bro said he won’t be shackled by legal stuff anymore. Dude is about to go on a war crime spree

  4. ImaginationToForm2 on

    Need to inundate Hegseth with 10000s of “all interactions” each day. Maybe he will get tired of it.

  5. This guys gotta go. What an embarrassment. These freaks are frothing at the mouth to make Americans lives worse. 

  6. Novel_Quote8017 on

    It’s always surprising to learn what has always been legal and simply wasn’t abused out of goodwill until now.

  7. I’m extremely curious to know what triggered this new guidance. Are military leaders speaking directly to Congress about how the current state of the country? Or, is this a preemptive move to head off any future coordination of a “contingency plan?”

  8. mildly_houseplant on

    Wouldn’t this mean that the approval office is buried in an insurmountable mountain of requests from day 1 of the policy taking effect? My understanding is that military liaisons and lawmakers are talking to each other all across the country all day every day? And now all of them need prior approval every single time? Effectively that would mean close to 0 functional communication now allowed between military and government except for an extremely small number of specific pre-approved messages.

  9. HallucinogenicFish on

    Firing JAGs, kicking the press out of the Pentagon, muzzling military officials.

    Sure seems like they’re hiding something or preparing to.

  10. One day they’re probably going to try to and restrict the common peoples ability to look at the US code.

    Until that day, however, I can go look at it and quote it:

    >[The right of employees, individually or collectively, to petition Congress or a Member of Congress, or to furnish information to either House of Congress, or to a committee or Member thereof, may not be interfered with or denied.](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7211#:~:text=5%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%207211,Prior%20Provisions)

  11. FFS. Let’s not pussy-foot around, let’s go all the way!

    Sometime later at a congressional hearing…

    Congress-critter: “So, Mr. Hesgeth, what is your title?”

    Pete: “I’m a military official and I have not been given permission to speak on such matters. Shit I shouldn’t even be here becasue I’ve not been granted permission to interact with Congress.”

  12. I can only imagine who gets posted as military liaisons to congressional offices now. I bet there is no litmus test to get that job nowadays.

  13. LuigiTheTweak_eth on

    Ummm when did the executives legislative priorities supersede Congresses legislative consent?

    We really need a Congress that isn’t just rubber stamp approval of executive overreach. Where are the legislators?!

  14. JustMakinStuff on

    Do you need prior approval before leaking attack plans to a reporter via a non-approved messaging app?

Leave A Reply