Trump’s FBI Spent Nearly $1 Million on Redacting Epstein Files | A new report reveals the FBI’s frantic “special redaction project” when they thought the Epstein files would be released.
Trump’s FBI Spent Nearly $1 Million on Redacting Epstein Files | A new report reveals the FBI’s frantic “special redaction project” when they thought the Epstein files would be released.
Then the eventual “release” of the Epstein files cannot be trusted fully. It’s all about constructing narratives with these politicians. No wonder people no longer respect them.
Significant_Cup_238 on
That sounds like the behavior of innocent people.
silkenDame on
And this is not criminality, why? I wish they are all rounded up and locked away for life
SmolishPPman on
Ya know, totally normal TRANSPARENT behavior
jojoebake on
disgraceful
Unusual-Plantain8104 on
{redacted} orange tan left stain on {redacted} after New York City Mogul {redacted} paid to be {redacted} with {redacted} in {redacted}. {redacted} mentioned he was kind of in a hurry because he was taping his reality T.V. show, the {redacted} later that day.
PaulClifford on
In the words of another infamous fascist, you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide.
In this case, however, it will be worse for Trump to redact – everyone will simply read “Trump” for every redaction.
And if they’re not redacting other names, they will undermine the basis for redacting anything in the first place, and some court will order everything produced un-redacted.
verone3784 on
I don’t understand what they expect to achieve from redacting the files that they have.
There are god knows how many lawyers, judges, law enforcement, plus the Epstein Estate, and a whole host of individuals including victims oof abuse who are clearly not pro-Trump who have seen documents that more than likely incriminate him, and there are obviously copies out there secured as part of legal proceedings.
They release redacted files, and peoople are just going to call them on it, and it’s going to make them look even more stupid than they already do.
B0redBeyondBelief on
I’m fully confident that they will somehow still manage to screw it up.
Minimum-Map9340 on
>Physical evidence includes photographs, travel logs, employee lists, over $17,000 in cash, five massage tables, blueprints of Epstein’s island and Manhattan home, four busts of female body parts, a pair of women’s cowboy boots, **one stuffed dog**, a logbook of visitors to Epstein’s private island, and a list described as a “document with names,” which could be Epstein’s rumored client list.
hmmm…
adv0cate4thed3vil on
If a mill was just overtime, I wonder what the total cost was/is. Call, it tainted, but I believe that this release is going to connect a lot of dots. Hopefully everything unravels. Imagine the amount of evidence and the complete lack of prosecution. That in itself is unexplainable.
Because nothing says “Transparency” like “opaque black sharpie”.
Buck_Thorn on
Hell, I’d just feed all the data into ChatGPT with the instructions to “Redact everything that has anything to do with Donald Trump”. Simple and cheap.
MichRedditor on
If you’re a FBI agent and you are working overtime to cover up a pedophile then you are just as a big of a piece of shit as the pedophile.
Not one single FBI guy can’t come out and be like yea this isnt right?
conicalanamorphosis on
Redacting or even reasonably parsing a set of documents and other files this large is a very difficult task to get right. Even if this isn’t being done by the “very smart, the smartest” people put in leadership positions in this administration, there’s nearly a 100% chance that it will be possible to use unredacted information (and other public information) to fill in many of the blanks left by redaction. No slight on the men and women doing the work, it’s just not possible to examine every direct and indirect link in the various documents and files to ensure redacted details can’t be regenerated. The data set is simply too large to do this with. The Internet has proven multiple times that if several hundred thousand folks (or more) start digging through your document trove, they find stuff you missed.
I think people who know they’re in the Epstein documents in an unflattering way should be working to put together a plan for when it’s their turn in the barrel. I can also guess which likely candidates for an “Epstein outing” will not consider doing that, mostly because it will never occur to them.
Ohuigin on
Cokehead Kash went from demanding an investigation into and release of the Epstein Files, to one of the main pedophile protectors in human history.
What an absolute pathetic existence.
Just…a shitstain of a human.
Ecstatic-Trouble- on
Our tax payer dollars spent protecting pedophiles
greysqualll on
The good news is these clowns are so incompetent shit is absolutely gonna slip through the cracks. Or, someone with a conscience is gonna “miss something”
kezow on
And then *still* didn’t release them and claimed they didn’t exist. So all that time and money and they still couldn’t scrub enough to get Trump’s stink off of them to be able to release.
233C on
In the US, depending on the jurisdiction a getaway driver may be charged for felony murder, if the main bank robbers kill someone while robbing the bank.
So, would covering the tracks of pedophiles fall more on the “accessory to human trafficking” or “tempering with evidence”?
Choice-of-SteinsGate on
Americans would be much more likely to believe that Trump’s latest reversal is genuine if his administration, alongside the DOJ and Republicans in Congress weren’t making every kind of effort over the last several months to run interference for Trump, delay votes, withhold information and divert attention away from this scandal and the president’s deep ties to the world’s most notorious child sex trafficker.
After months of trying desperately to bury this scandal, Trump is now publicly reversing his stance because his DOJ has made sure to comb through and selectively omit every document, every word, every piece of evidence that could implicate him and anyone he’s trying to protect.
if you think Trump and his DOJ will approve the release of anything remotely transparent, then I have some Trump meme coin to sell you.
It’s already been reported that the FBI was tasked with digging through thousands of pages of Epstein related materials to search for any mention of Trump. The implications are obvious. What other intention could the Trump administration possibly have for instructing the FBI to basically ctrl-F Trump’s name for redaction or some other nefarious purpose?
It’s also telling that it took ten months for Republicans to unanimously vote in favor of releasing whatever information the DOJ finds adequate enough to placate the base. And only after their ringleader gave them the okay. Prior to that, the goal was to obstruct and distract at any cost, and at the insistent behest of Trump of course.
This distraction effort included political stunts and diversions like when the DOJ tried to manufacture “treasonous” charges against Obama while justice department officials were privately courting Ghislaine Maxwell at the same time.
Republicans—predominantly Mike Johnson—even used the government shutdown as an excuse to suppress and delay the disclosure of Epstein related documents.
Johnson deliberately delayed swearing in congresswoman Grijalva in order to prevent her from being the yes needed on a discharge petition that would force a vote on the further release of Epstein material.
And in response to Democrats releasing emails obtained by the Epstein estate recently, Trump ordered Republicans to not authorize any additional disclosures. Mere days had passed when Trump completely changed his tune. How does this *not* arouse suspicions?
And bear in mind that Trump always had the authority to order the release of these documents, but instead chose to pass that responsibility onto others. It speaks volumes that this is one of the few times that Trump didn’t exercise his unilateral powers.
Trump even sued the WSJ for releasing the infamous birthday letter:
> The letter concludes: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
How can any sensible person believe that Trump’s about-face reflects a desire for full disclosure or even sympathy for the victims?
And the answer to this rhetorical question should be made more evident by the fact that the Trump administration has spent the better part of his term dismantling independent oversight, obfuscating facts and data and putting up barriers to transparency.
Not accounting for Trump’s own desperate efforts to sweep this scandal under the rug since it was first revealed that his administration had no intention of releasing the “Epstein files.”
Or his constant politicizing of the “files” and his insistence that the whole thing is just another “democratic hoax.”
Trump has also contradicted himself on this matter repeatedly. First there were binders full of files, then there weren’t, but Republicans were also releasing carefully selected documents of their own, much of which was previously made public.
Then his administration signaled that the investigation was basically over, but his deputy AG and personal lawyer went to Florida to interview Ghislaine Maxwell in private under the guise of learning more about Epstein’s crimes, but it was really just an effort to orchestrate a cover up with Maxwell in exchange for clemency and a transfer to a cushy, low security, white collar prison nicknamed “club fed.”
Reports came out revealing that Trump’s name appeared in the documents, but Trump continued insisting that it was all a “hoax” while at the same time urging investigations into Democrats who are included in the documents that supposedly never existed in the first place.
Fox News even deliberately edited Trump’s response during an interview when he was asked if he would release the “Epstein client list.”
> “Yeah, I think we should release it. People deserve to know.”
Fox left out his follow up:
> “But you have to understand, there’s a lot of lies in that list. A lot of names that shouldn’t be there. You don’t want to ruin innocent lives.”
And now you expect me to believe that Trump’s sudden reversal and the GOP’s conveniently timed change of heart are even remotely sincere? Give me a break.
I also want to address a common whataboutism from Trump supporters who demand to know why “Biden/Democrats didn’t release the files,” which is almost always asked in bad faith as part of a not-so-subtle attempt to try to exonerate Trump of wrongdoing.
First, the current controversy doesn’t revolve around past inaction, but around Trump’s efforts to stall and block the release of Epstein materials. It’s also centered around his flagrantly corrupt behavior throughout this whole fiasco; his consolidation of legal and prosecutorial powers under a DOJ that is now beholden to him; his administration’s utter lack of transparency; and Trump’s inconsistencies in the face of political pressures. In other words, ***stop deflecting*** Trump supporters.
That said, and contrary to what conservatives claim, Democrats did call for transparency and pushed for the release of Epstein related records as early as 2019, and even continued pressing for information through Biden’s term.
Democrats even requested hearings and pressured the DOJ for accountability, despite facing legal and bureaucratic obstacles.
Moreover, Democrats did not have unilateral authority over the release of the “Epstein files” during Biden’s presidency.
Documents related to the investigation were held under the authority of the Department of Justice, and a DOJ that was not stripped of its independence and undemocratically faithful to the president like it is now.
Ongoing investigations, privacy concerns and strict legal constraints prevented their release and/or slowed the process. At the time, president Biden couldn’t just publicly disclose sensitive materials and case files without obstructing investigations and violating statutes.
It’s also important to note that Epstein was not at the center of the cultural and political conversation during Biden’s campaign. Not like it was for Trump in the run up to the 2024 election.
Epstein’s arrest and death had just occurred while Trump was president in 2019, but in 2020, and in case you need a reminder, the country was undergoing an economic and global health crisis, which was only made worse by Trump’s mishandling of the pandemic and his kleptocratic policies that ballooned the debt and deficit. Not to mention January 6th and a national discussion about political violence and extremism that followed. Priorities were focused elsewhere to say the least.
Lord-Nagafen on
Ctrl + F “Trump” then delete all. How did that cost $1m?
spatulamaster303 on
Won’t even be digital or paper-based – they’ll just release a big tub of black paint.
exophrine on
…and guess what? All the “Lefties” and Democrats will be left unredacted, and then MAGA will completely ignore the black marks and say *”SeE? TrUmP iSn’T tHeRe!!”*
Appropriate-Soft-188 on
So what’s to stop one of those guys from taking an unredacted copy and leaking it?
Gord_Board on
Waste of time, anyone who still supports trump isn’t going to care what comes out in the epstein files.
Imaginary_Chair_6958 on
Given their panic and delays around Epstein, I believe everything that has been alleged about Trump’s behavior, including Katie Johnson’s accusations. What we already know is damning enough.
And you can’t say “Well, Trump doesn’t seem like the type” because he seems exactly the type: arrogant, entitled, no empathy for victims, no moral standards, not averse to rape and sexual assault, frequently pictured with young girls, in charge of Miss Teen USA, numerous creepy comments about young girls and his ‘every day is a wonderful secret’ message in Epstein’s birthday book. Not to mention the many contact numbers Epstein had for Trump. They were close friends.
YesterdayCareless901 on
Nothing really new or surprising here. I wish I could skip to the end, just watch the final climactic battle scene. All this talking is getting on my nerves.
Ludate_Solem on
Just like the way the jfk assassination was handles and caused a lot of distrust in politicians, the epstein files will go down in history as another reason people lost faith in politicians.
Indaflow on
$1m that we know about!
BradlyPitts89 on
Let that sink-in, the US gov is spending tax money to protect pedophiles…This is why the current gov is so hostile towards people. *False Consciousness much?*
WardenEdgewise on
But… there are copies or originals, or backups of the files somewhere else, right? Just because the FBI redacted all mention of Trump in the FBI copies of the files, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t original unedited copies available the files in the possession of a safe third party?
blackmobius on
Trump will release the files and when they come out solid black boxes he will throw Patel and possibly Bondi under the bus to save himself.
Del_3030 on
Sounds like we need a patriotic whistleblower
Then_Journalist_317 on
Wasted effort. Everyone already knows each redacted name is “Donald Trump”
withnodrawal on
It’s all going to be redacted because they will say foreigns could use it for blackmail.
Fuck blackmail at that point, everyone can know when we bleed their bank accounts and put them behind bars.
osirus35 on
The files will be released clearly modified and Trump will probably throw the FBI under the bus as if he doesn’t know they are doing the things
37 Comments
Then the eventual “release” of the Epstein files cannot be trusted fully. It’s all about constructing narratives with these politicians. No wonder people no longer respect them.
That sounds like the behavior of innocent people.
And this is not criminality, why? I wish they are all rounded up and locked away for life
Ya know, totally normal TRANSPARENT behavior
disgraceful
{redacted} orange tan left stain on {redacted} after New York City Mogul {redacted} paid to be {redacted} with {redacted} in {redacted}. {redacted} mentioned he was kind of in a hurry because he was taping his reality T.V. show, the {redacted} later that day.
In the words of another infamous fascist, you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide.
In this case, however, it will be worse for Trump to redact – everyone will simply read “Trump” for every redaction.
And if they’re not redacting other names, they will undermine the basis for redacting anything in the first place, and some court will order everything produced un-redacted.
I don’t understand what they expect to achieve from redacting the files that they have.
There are god knows how many lawyers, judges, law enforcement, plus the Epstein Estate, and a whole host of individuals including victims oof abuse who are clearly not pro-Trump who have seen documents that more than likely incriminate him, and there are obviously copies out there secured as part of legal proceedings.
They release redacted files, and peoople are just going to call them on it, and it’s going to make them look even more stupid than they already do.
I’m fully confident that they will somehow still manage to screw it up.
>Physical evidence includes photographs, travel logs, employee lists, over $17,000 in cash, five massage tables, blueprints of Epstein’s island and Manhattan home, four busts of female body parts, a pair of women’s cowboy boots, **one stuffed dog**, a logbook of visitors to Epstein’s private island, and a list described as a “document with names,” which could be Epstein’s rumored client list.
hmmm…
If a mill was just overtime, I wonder what the total cost was/is. Call, it tainted, but I believe that this release is going to connect a lot of dots. Hopefully everything unravels. Imagine the amount of evidence and the complete lack of prosecution. That in itself is unexplainable.
>the DOJ has been [paying](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-11-25/epstein-files-new-fbi-emails-detail-review-special-redaction-project) FBI agents nearly $1 million in overtime to work on the “Epstein Transparency Project” at a bureau facility in Winchester, Virginia.
Because nothing says “Transparency” like “opaque black sharpie”.
Hell, I’d just feed all the data into ChatGPT with the instructions to “Redact everything that has anything to do with Donald Trump”. Simple and cheap.
If you’re a FBI agent and you are working overtime to cover up a pedophile then you are just as a big of a piece of shit as the pedophile.
Not one single FBI guy can’t come out and be like yea this isnt right?
Redacting or even reasonably parsing a set of documents and other files this large is a very difficult task to get right. Even if this isn’t being done by the “very smart, the smartest” people put in leadership positions in this administration, there’s nearly a 100% chance that it will be possible to use unredacted information (and other public information) to fill in many of the blanks left by redaction. No slight on the men and women doing the work, it’s just not possible to examine every direct and indirect link in the various documents and files to ensure redacted details can’t be regenerated. The data set is simply too large to do this with. The Internet has proven multiple times that if several hundred thousand folks (or more) start digging through your document trove, they find stuff you missed.
I think people who know they’re in the Epstein documents in an unflattering way should be working to put together a plan for when it’s their turn in the barrel. I can also guess which likely candidates for an “Epstein outing” will not consider doing that, mostly because it will never occur to them.
Cokehead Kash went from demanding an investigation into and release of the Epstein Files, to one of the main pedophile protectors in human history.
What an absolute pathetic existence.
Just…a shitstain of a human.
Our tax payer dollars spent protecting pedophiles
The good news is these clowns are so incompetent shit is absolutely gonna slip through the cracks. Or, someone with a conscience is gonna “miss something”
And then *still* didn’t release them and claimed they didn’t exist. So all that time and money and they still couldn’t scrub enough to get Trump’s stink off of them to be able to release.
In the US, depending on the jurisdiction a getaway driver may be charged for felony murder, if the main bank robbers kill someone while robbing the bank.
So, would covering the tracks of pedophiles fall more on the “accessory to human trafficking” or “tempering with evidence”?
Americans would be much more likely to believe that Trump’s latest reversal is genuine if his administration, alongside the DOJ and Republicans in Congress weren’t making every kind of effort over the last several months to run interference for Trump, delay votes, withhold information and divert attention away from this scandal and the president’s deep ties to the world’s most notorious child sex trafficker.
After months of trying desperately to bury this scandal, Trump is now publicly reversing his stance because his DOJ has made sure to comb through and selectively omit every document, every word, every piece of evidence that could implicate him and anyone he’s trying to protect.
if you think Trump and his DOJ will approve the release of anything remotely transparent, then I have some Trump meme coin to sell you.
It’s already been reported that the FBI was tasked with digging through thousands of pages of Epstein related materials to search for any mention of Trump. The implications are obvious. What other intention could the Trump administration possibly have for instructing the FBI to basically ctrl-F Trump’s name for redaction or some other nefarious purpose?
It’s also telling that it took ten months for Republicans to unanimously vote in favor of releasing whatever information the DOJ finds adequate enough to placate the base. And only after their ringleader gave them the okay. Prior to that, the goal was to obstruct and distract at any cost, and at the insistent behest of Trump of course.
This distraction effort included political stunts and diversions like when the DOJ tried to manufacture “treasonous” charges against Obama while justice department officials were privately courting Ghislaine Maxwell at the same time.
Republicans—predominantly Mike Johnson—even used the government shutdown as an excuse to suppress and delay the disclosure of Epstein related documents.
Johnson deliberately delayed swearing in congresswoman Grijalva in order to prevent her from being the yes needed on a discharge petition that would force a vote on the further release of Epstein material.
And in response to Democrats releasing emails obtained by the Epstein estate recently, Trump ordered Republicans to not authorize any additional disclosures. Mere days had passed when Trump completely changed his tune. How does this *not* arouse suspicions?
And bear in mind that Trump always had the authority to order the release of these documents, but instead chose to pass that responsibility onto others. It speaks volumes that this is one of the few times that Trump didn’t exercise his unilateral powers.
Trump even sued the WSJ for releasing the infamous birthday letter:
> The letter concludes: “Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
How can any sensible person believe that Trump’s about-face reflects a desire for full disclosure or even sympathy for the victims?
And the answer to this rhetorical question should be made more evident by the fact that the Trump administration has spent the better part of his term dismantling independent oversight, obfuscating facts and data and putting up barriers to transparency.
Not accounting for Trump’s own desperate efforts to sweep this scandal under the rug since it was first revealed that his administration had no intention of releasing the “Epstein files.”
Or his constant politicizing of the “files” and his insistence that the whole thing is just another “democratic hoax.”
Trump has also contradicted himself on this matter repeatedly. First there were binders full of files, then there weren’t, but Republicans were also releasing carefully selected documents of their own, much of which was previously made public.
Then his administration signaled that the investigation was basically over, but his deputy AG and personal lawyer went to Florida to interview Ghislaine Maxwell in private under the guise of learning more about Epstein’s crimes, but it was really just an effort to orchestrate a cover up with Maxwell in exchange for clemency and a transfer to a cushy, low security, white collar prison nicknamed “club fed.”
Reports came out revealing that Trump’s name appeared in the documents, but Trump continued insisting that it was all a “hoax” while at the same time urging investigations into Democrats who are included in the documents that supposedly never existed in the first place.
Fox News even deliberately edited Trump’s response during an interview when he was asked if he would release the “Epstein client list.”
> “Yeah, I think we should release it. People deserve to know.”
Fox left out his follow up:
> “But you have to understand, there’s a lot of lies in that list. A lot of names that shouldn’t be there. You don’t want to ruin innocent lives.”
And now you expect me to believe that Trump’s sudden reversal and the GOP’s conveniently timed change of heart are even remotely sincere? Give me a break.
I also want to address a common whataboutism from Trump supporters who demand to know why “Biden/Democrats didn’t release the files,” which is almost always asked in bad faith as part of a not-so-subtle attempt to try to exonerate Trump of wrongdoing.
First, the current controversy doesn’t revolve around past inaction, but around Trump’s efforts to stall and block the release of Epstein materials. It’s also centered around his flagrantly corrupt behavior throughout this whole fiasco; his consolidation of legal and prosecutorial powers under a DOJ that is now beholden to him; his administration’s utter lack of transparency; and Trump’s inconsistencies in the face of political pressures. In other words, ***stop deflecting*** Trump supporters.
That said, and contrary to what conservatives claim, Democrats did call for transparency and pushed for the release of Epstein related records as early as 2019, and even continued pressing for information through Biden’s term.
Democrats even requested hearings and pressured the DOJ for accountability, despite facing legal and bureaucratic obstacles.
Moreover, Democrats did not have unilateral authority over the release of the “Epstein files” during Biden’s presidency.
Documents related to the investigation were held under the authority of the Department of Justice, and a DOJ that was not stripped of its independence and undemocratically faithful to the president like it is now.
Ongoing investigations, privacy concerns and strict legal constraints prevented their release and/or slowed the process. At the time, president Biden couldn’t just publicly disclose sensitive materials and case files without obstructing investigations and violating statutes.
It’s also important to note that Epstein was not at the center of the cultural and political conversation during Biden’s campaign. Not like it was for Trump in the run up to the 2024 election.
Epstein’s arrest and death had just occurred while Trump was president in 2019, but in 2020, and in case you need a reminder, the country was undergoing an economic and global health crisis, which was only made worse by Trump’s mishandling of the pandemic and his kleptocratic policies that ballooned the debt and deficit. Not to mention January 6th and a national discussion about political violence and extremism that followed. Priorities were focused elsewhere to say the least.
Ctrl + F “Trump” then delete all. How did that cost $1m?
Won’t even be digital or paper-based – they’ll just release a big tub of black paint.
…and guess what? All the “Lefties” and Democrats will be left unredacted, and then MAGA will completely ignore the black marks and say *”SeE? TrUmP iSn’T tHeRe!!”*
So what’s to stop one of those guys from taking an unredacted copy and leaking it?
Waste of time, anyone who still supports trump isn’t going to care what comes out in the epstein files.
Given their panic and delays around Epstein, I believe everything that has been alleged about Trump’s behavior, including Katie Johnson’s accusations. What we already know is damning enough.
And you can’t say “Well, Trump doesn’t seem like the type” because he seems exactly the type: arrogant, entitled, no empathy for victims, no moral standards, not averse to rape and sexual assault, frequently pictured with young girls, in charge of Miss Teen USA, numerous creepy comments about young girls and his ‘every day is a wonderful secret’ message in Epstein’s birthday book. Not to mention the many contact numbers Epstein had for Trump. They were close friends.
Nothing really new or surprising here. I wish I could skip to the end, just watch the final climactic battle scene. All this talking is getting on my nerves.
Just like the way the jfk assassination was handles and caused a lot of distrust in politicians, the epstein files will go down in history as another reason people lost faith in politicians.
$1m that we know about!
Let that sink-in, the US gov is spending tax money to protect pedophiles…This is why the current gov is so hostile towards people. *False Consciousness much?*
But… there are copies or originals, or backups of the files somewhere else, right? Just because the FBI redacted all mention of Trump in the FBI copies of the files, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t original unedited copies available the files in the possession of a safe third party?
Trump will release the files and when they come out solid black boxes he will throw Patel and possibly Bondi under the bus to save himself.
Sounds like we need a patriotic whistleblower
Wasted effort. Everyone already knows each redacted name is “Donald Trump”
It’s all going to be redacted because they will say foreigns could use it for blackmail.
Fuck blackmail at that point, everyone can know when we bleed their bank accounts and put them behind bars.
The files will be released clearly modified and Trump will probably throw the FBI under the bus as if he doesn’t know they are doing the things