Share.

30 Comments

  1. Anyone in a position to issue orders to subordinates knows that it is illegal to kill unarmed men.

  2. Military 101. Basic knowledge everyone learns in their first year, reiterated during pre-deployment training.

  3. XxNimblyBimblyXx on

    Legit question is there international law about not killing survivors of a military target/vehicle, if this was a legit declared war?

  4. There are stories of the ACTUAL nazis having more respect for POW’s and the laws of war than this administration does. If more people were capable of thinking critically, it would really make you think.

  5. Well I suppose I appreciate republicans handling us an obvious out from their nonsensical traitor claims. Not even magats can deny that perhaps Democrats had a point with Hennessybreath issuing wildly illegal orders to murder helpless noncombatants.

    What the fuck am I saying? Of course they’ll deny it. Reality is whatever trump says it is to <40% of the county.

  6. YardOptimal9329 on

    Ok but why are all these stories making it seem like the first order was legal??!!!! What’s this emphasis on the second one, which was heinous, as if the first one was lawful?

  7. The second order was unconstitutional and clearly so. It was pure murder. The soldiers who did it may have some plausible deniability depending on what they knew and how they were given, but very likely they are on the hook for murder here in a legal sense. And much less likely to be remembered in Trump’s pardons. They can’t pay his bribes, and he just doesn’t care about them.

  8. Itsprobablysarcasm on

    Everyone in that chain of command who did carry out the order needs to be charged and held to account.

    America really needs to start rooting out the cancer that is MAGA or it is going to destroy the nation.

  9. Chaddywackpack on

    Not that it would happen, but in the slim hypothetical that Capt Kelly is impacted by recalling him to the military and Court Martialing him, for me would be the absolute last straw in a bed of last straws.

  10. MyFirstCarWasA_Vega on

    Killing survivors has always been our military’s credo. Wait. Stop. Reverse that. Thanks Willy.

  11. nohandsfootball on

    I won’t even lie on powerpoints when my bosses ask me to, I sure as hell ain’t war criming anyone

  12. When you execute of an enemy combatant who is ‘hors de combat,’ or taken out of the fight due to injury or surrender, you break the Law of Armed Confict. No matter how you cut it, thats illegal.

  13. It’s so refreshing to see someone as decorated as Senator Kelly speak up and say simple truths. I loved the interview after suffering through Noem’s

  14. He wouldn’t have followed order to execute the first strike even. He knows these people have zero due process to protect themselves. They might not be our citizens, but they are of another nation and we respect our laws and other nation’s laws too.

  15. Whatever threat those people posed was neutralized with the destruction of their boat. Attacking them in the first place was already arguably an illegal act, shooting them like fish in a barrel afterwards absolutely was.

Leave A Reply