Share.

28 Comments

  1. I guess the Trump admin can actually put together a case so flimsy that they can’t get a ham sandwich indicted.

  2. Rocky-Sullivan on

    Unfortunately this is probably just going to keep happening until they get the outcome they want.

     

  3. You mean you can’t just charge someone with a crime because you don’t like them. Damn, learn something everyday!

  4. > A grand jury declined to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James after being asked to look at the mortgage fraud case against her a second time, 10 days after a federal judge threw out the initial charges against her, according to a person familiar with the development Thursday.

    > Another source familiar with the situation said there should be no premature celebration, because the Justice Department could try to seek the indictment a third time.

    The DOJ might try for a *third* time.

  5. Another swing and a miss.

    >Another source familiar with the situation said there should be no premature celebration, because the Justice Department could try to seek the indictment a third time.

    But what happens when the grand jury declines to indict a third time? And what bozo is even bringing these charges now that Trump’s previous court jester has been disqualified?

  6. I’d love to know what they argued with this grand jury vs the last one. Did they leave something out last time?

  7. HighbornHunger on

    People forget a grand jury is not a fan club. If they pass twice, it means the evidence was weak. Simple as that.

  8. Interesting they opted to go for a new grand jury indictment rather than appeal the “Lindsey Halligan was illegally appointed” ruling…are they just going to appoint someone else or….? Can they not actually appeal the dismissal??

    If they go this route Im pretty sure the comey indictment (for perjury at least) would be dead because of statute of limitations 

  9. Stupid grand jury. She hurt Trump’s wittle fee-fees. I’m pretty sure the Supreme Court said that’s a capital offense.

  10. Lol I thought the joke was that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich. How incompetent do you have to be 😆

  11. Fuck it, take a third bite at the apple, why not. Can the fact that this prosecution has eaten shit twice already be admissible as defense arguments to the jury?

  12. Mysterious-Wasabi103 on

    Remember when Republicans acted like literally anyone could get indicted by a grand jury of their peers?

  13. Funny because the requirements for a grand jury are pretty loose. Tells you there’s no tangible evidence of wrongdoing.

  14. Citizens participating in the rule of law. Proud to be an American 🇺🇸

    Wild too that it is sooo much easier to get a grand jury indictment vs a jury conviction.

    And Trump was convicted 34 times by a jury.

Leave A Reply