Colorado Officials Reject Trump’s ‘Pardon’ of a Convicted Election Denier: The president’s stated intention to pardon Tina Peters, jailed for tampering with election machines in 2020, has set off a legal fight over the extent of Mr. Trump’s pardon powers.

Source: Silent-Resort-3076

Share.

32 Comments

  1. Silent-Resort-3076 on

    *I know this subject matter has been posted to death, but I ~~like~~ LOVE when Trump is rejected!!*😋

    **Snippet**:

    * President Trump’s pledge to pardon Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines, touched off a furious new battle on Friday over the fate of perhaps the last high-profile 2020 election denier still behind bars.
    * Democratic leaders in Colorado dismissed the pardon as an empty attempt to bully a Democratic state into freeing one of the president’s political allies. They argued that Mr. Trump had no legal power to overturn Ms. Peters’ conviction in state court.

  2. There shouldn’t be any legal fight in the first place. The constitution is very clear on what to do in this situation and unless Trump wants to invade Colorado and break her out, she is going nowhere

  3. >They argued that Mr. Trump had no legal power to overturn Ms. Peters’s conviction in state court.

    They “argued?” How about: **Trump has no legal power to overturn Ms. Peters’s conviction in state court.** Fucking corporate media cowards.

  4. Don’t worry, the corrupt Republican controlled supreme court will intervene here and say that Trump has the power to do what ever the fuck he wants.

  5. This is a reminder that presidential power isn’t unlimited, no matter how much Trump wants it to be. States will have authority, and they don’t have to play along with political pardons meant to score loyalty points.

  6. TemporalColdWarrior on

    I am not sure they’d release her even if the Supreme Court issues more new edicts on presidential power. This is a state crime, there is no nuance here, we either have federalism or tyranny.

  7. Give me the Supreme Court a week and they’ll change the law so the president can pardon anyone.

  8. It is outrageous for the NYT to characterize this as a “legal fight.” There is no fight. All serious lawyers and legal scholars agree that the President cannot grant pardons for State offenses.

  9. Raspberries-Are-Evil on

    They should just laugh at how much of a fucking moron he is.

    Dont file anything in court. Just ignore him.

  10. Sea-Jackfruit411 on

    Oh, the irony. He is literally filling the streets of the US with criminals. Who did the GOP accuse of doing that?

  11. He’s pardoned her of a federal crime maybe (if shitty twitter announcements count), she’s incarcerated for a state one.

  12. ThisAccountIsStolen on

    He’s likely doing it as a test case because he wants to make his own state convictions go away.

  13. Fantastic_Shaman9230 on

    Every time he calls or sends a communication, say ‘ok’ and don’t do shit. Trump is one stupid motherfucker… and his supporters are even more so.

  14. StrigiStockBacking on

    Fuck off NYT. You’re complicit in this fresh hell we’re in. I don’t believe a word they say, whether for or against DJT

  15. This just feels like more proof that he and his ilk tampered with machines to win the election. Democrats are such cowards to not even try to comprehensively verify election integrity.

  16. Things that we might want to end: the presidential pardon, congressional stock trading, and Citizens United.

Leave A Reply