Share.

32 Comments

  1. doonerthesooner on

    In a debate? I’m sure she would. In a national election, I hope so but I’m less confident.

  2. I support AOC, and JD Vance sucks ass, but that matchup would be fucking hell. It would be him constantly saying dumb incendiary shit to bait her and rile his base, and unfortunately, I say this as a woman, any reaction (not matter how reasoned and based in principle or human decency) is going to be framed to make her look crazy. Misogynists, and there are plenty who vote red or blue, would eat that up.

  3. IpeeEhh_Phanatic on

    She would be a better president. She would still lose to him. America is too low IQ to try a woman president

  4. Relevant_Eye1333 on

    The problem is, does she have the votes in the Senate, WHY WHY WHY, do you people forget that Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin derailed and sank Joe Biden’s agenda? And those two had a big old D next to their name, they voted to deny an increase in the federal minimum wage, Joe machin voted against the child tax credit that cut childhood poverty in half.

    you have to get rid of these snakes in the grass democrats or they will give you another neo-liberal adminstration, your schumers, warner, cantwell, gillibrand, etc. IDK if you all weren’t paying attention but the democrats sent out members that were retiring or not up for election in 2026 when they voted with the republicans. The current democratic party HATES YOU and will do everything the republicans ask.

    if you cannot get it through you head that a democrat, in 2025 that says they’re against medicare for all, for the filibuster, is a no-go, you’re the reason we’re here.

  5. NGL, AOC chuckin’ some heavy shade! 😂 She shoots straight and ain’t afraid of a fight, got mad respect for that. +1 if she’d actually run, would be interesting AF. 🔥 Let’s see some more young blood stirring things up in the political arena!

  6. I don’t want her as the next President. I don’t want the first woman President to inherit a fundamentally broken country. Let the men clean up after themselves.

  7. Sadly, JD would probably win. I still think Trump is going to try and do everything he can to run again or just stay in power with multiple court cases looming.

  8. Choice-of-SteinsGate on

    Despite the fact that AOC isn’t a socialist, conservatives continue to portray her as one while calling out her hypocrisy for being a consumer in America…

    It seems like their idea of a socialist is someone who lives like an ascetic monk; denying every desire and/or comfort in this world; embracing poverty and relinquishing all of their material goods and money to others; only eating the fruit that falls from trees; refusing to participate as a consumer in a capitalist driven economy and culture; chopping wood and carrying water until they drop dead from exhaustion or starvation.

    If they’re so scared of the big bad boogeyman that is socialism, they should direct their attention towards the most hypocritical socialists in America—the rich.

    Their secret motto has always been socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for the poor, and Republicans are their favorite mascot.

    This idea that poverty is a moral failing and not an economic trap has been instilled into the Republican consciousness.

    And every time some right-wing mouthpiece for this administration posts some fearmongering tirade about socialism, they’re only revealing just how out of touch they are, how nonsensical this whole culture war obsession has become, and perhaps more importantly, how it’s Republicans who mindlessly side with and elect the rich.

    Republican voters forsake their own self-interests because the billionaires they elect have a moratorium on political propaganda.

    Networks like Fox “News” and all adjacent media/conservative influencers continue to use their culture wars to scapegoat the poor, the disadvantaged, the marginalized, minorities, immigrants, Muslims, etc, so they can distract voters from the fact that the Republican Party is picking their pockets clean.

    It’s been this way ever since the modern conservative movement was ushered in by the grandfather of tax cuts for the rich and wealth redistribution: Ronald Reagan.

  9. PrefersEarlGrey on

    Would vote for her in a heartbeat but rural America is unfortunately overrepresented thanks to the electoral college, and they will never vote for a woman, or a woman of color for that matter.

    Let’s not make the same mistakes of 2024, which was a repeat of 2016.

  10. Yeah Kamala thought the same thing too.

    Never underestimate the stupidity of the electorate.

    No thanks.

  11. If she really said that… she needs to shut the heck up. She’s a 100% loss for Dems if she gets the nomination.

  12. 673NoshMyBollocksAve on

    I would definitely vote for her. I might not agree with everything she says, but I think she has integrity.

  13. Kamala and Hillary also thought to win the POTUS. I wish people paid attention to the obvious instead of living in la la land blindly optimistic

  14. I love AOC. I think her and Jasmine Crockett are the future of the party. But I also acknowledge that AOC is divisive even among Democrats and is notably less popular outside of NY. And say what you will, but our electorate has pretty emphatically just got finished saying they’ll elect a racist autocrat who claims Haitians eat dogs before they elect a minority woman. Or a woman at all.

    AOC would do a hell of a lot better for the party, NY, and the country as a whole running for Schumer’s seat. The rest of the country is not ready for a woman President, and unfortunately have said they have no desire for one either.

  15. Well yes and no.

    She would obviously stomp him in every aspect of being a politician, leader, and morally decent human. But in the polls, she’d get slammed. She forgets who half the country voted for, and twice. Also, there’s a good chance that regardless of her grassroots support, the 90 million eligible non-voting Americans will still be non-voters.

  16. Lol she is delusional. She’d wash him in a debate but there’s no way the general electorate votes for a Latina woman socialist

  17. First: she’s a strong legislator, and should consider a move to the Senate . . . for now. 

    Second: I’m not sure she WOULD stomp Vance. She’d be smarter, more eloquent, and far more qualified than Vance, but — if we’ve learned anything from 2016 and 2024 — this country would rather elect a boorish, idiot man than a well-qualified woman.

Leave A Reply