Share.

20 Comments

  1. Who exactly were they trying to win over with that trick?

    It feels like they knew Trump was in serious trouble and decided to take as many people down with him as possible.

    I would have just released the files at this point. The midterms are like in three weeks and the last thing you want is to give the opposition something to run on if you want to keep your majority.

    The stuff in those files must be so bad Trump is willing to throw away his political power for it.

  2. brain_overclocked on

    >Multiple outlets, including The Associated Press and CBS, reported that dozens of the files that were previously available in the documents vanished by Saturday with no explanation from the White House, sparking accusations that President Donald Trump’s DOJ is selectively withholding information.

    >On Friday, Abigail Jackson posted a photo on X of the “Thriller” singer, Clinton and Ross alongside several minors whose faces appeared redacted in the image.

    >“Per the Epstein Files Transparency Act, DOJ was specifically instructed only to redact the faces of victims and/or minors,” she captioned the post. “Here is a picture of Bill Clinton with his arm around Michael Jackson, and redacted individuals.”

    >The press secretary was subsequently called out on X by progressive media company MeidasTouch Network for alluding that the trio were involved in Epstein’s sex crimes despite the photo being a publicly available fundraiser image featuring the pop star and Ross’ own children.

    >“How dare you. Those are Michael Jackson’s sons and Diana Ross’ son — not victims — as you are implying,” the company wrote. “This is a publicly available photo from an event they attended together.”

    The White House didn’t immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

  3. SuperstitiousPigeon5 on

    Seriously, did they think people wouldn’t check the photos??

    I hope the estates sue the shit out of the government.

  4. AcanthisittaNo6653 on

    >erroneously inserting a photo

    There is nothing erroneous about it. If the White House is intentionally dropping their own photos into the Epstein stream, how can we trust anything DOJ is putting out? DOJ is getting White House help flaunting the law and deceiving Americans.

  5. Surely the estate of Michael Jackson would have a field day suing for defamation on this one. Like gross misconduct “we-get-to-have-all-the-tariff-money” levels of defamation, right?

  6. Tweeting at someone while they never read it and give 0 fucks is not calling them out and this website is a rag

  7. heytherehihelllo on

    Wait this is real? They photoshopped or used ai to fake photos in this release? I know I shouldn’t be surprised but how are their sheep followers not outraged by this? Actually they probably think it’s funny. “He’s playing 8D chess man open your eyes”

  8. epstein survivors waiting for actual outreach get a tweet of MJ spinning instead nothing says ‘we care’ like moon-walking around accountability

  9. Abigail Jackson really said ‘hold my beer’ and posted a Getty-stock pic of MJ & Diana Ross like it was Epstein Island CCTV

Leave A Reply