Share.

39 Comments

  1. Given that half of congress and their billionaire daddies are in those files I don’t think for 1 second we’ll get the un-redacted files in their lifetimes.

  2. Clinton is far from clean, but they are trying to use him as a distraction. So release it all and let the chips fall. From what I get many of the victims are out there already and are ok with the release. It would suck, but I am just about to say just release it all and redact nothing. Let the victims sue those that supported Epstein so they never have to work another day in their lives.

  3. Both-District2499 on

    How many young American women who definitely didn’t commit suicide but that was listed as the cause of death anyway wrote A Memoir about being molested by Bill clinton? It’s a serious question. I only know about the women who have written about Trump

  4. reddittorbrigade on

    Release them unredacted now.

    Everyone wanted it except Trump who has molested and raped multiple innocent girls.

  5. Either he’s actually clean, or he knows he’s still going to look fucking pristine next to Trump.

    My money’s on the former, honestly. If there was anything worse than sitting in a pool with his clothes on, Republicans would have published it a long time ago. They sure fucking wouldn’t redact it to protect him.

    e: There’s always a million purity testers replying to these threads, so: If it comes out that he anything illegal, he can share a cell with Trump. I shouldn’t even have to say this shit.

  6. Mindless_Listen7622 on

    It’s pretty weird that USA Today would use the photoshopped photo of Clinton, Michael Jackson and Diana Ross, and Bill Clinton in a hot tub at a hotel, unless their point was that the Trump administration is being dishonest (which they are).

  7. 2 points: 1. Dragging out and redacting large swaths of info as well as employing the usual gaggle of incompetents that are drawn to Trump and his sycophantic lieutenants to handle these redactions guarantees that this story will stay in the news for a long, long, long time. 2. There must be some hella damning shit in there about Trump for them to choose option 1 to handle this.

  8. From the article:

    But “selective releases to imply wrongdoing” would confirm “the widespread suspicion” that releases are about “insinuation” implying wrongdoing rather than transparency, Urena said.

    The DOJ needs to be investigated because they’re obviously trying to put all the heat on everyone else but Trump and to me that is corruption.

  9. One juicy rant against [[insert flavor of the week]] coming up!

    I’m so tired of misdirection but that’s just what his Truth SociaI shows whenever he’s cornered.

    Another loooong post from a demented old man!

  10. This week’s edition of the Washington Generals pleading with the referees that the Harlem Globetrotters can’t keep getting away with it!

  11. MAGA thinks the left is trying to protect Clinton. The left doesn’t give a shit about anyone of they’re pedos.

  12. There are very definitely further steps that need to be taken, but maybe let’s not let Bill Clinton- moral authority that he is- steer the process.

  13. nightmaredaycare on

    This is why the cover-up won’t work. Clinton or Gates or anyone else the republican party wants to throw under the bus, will sing. And there, behind a blacked out page, is surely some fucked up shit done by an orange narcissist.

    Trump knows that others will sing. He avoids answering questions about it because he knows all roads lead to his tower. He didn’t think anyone would find out

  14. manmythmustache on

    It’d be funny if Clinton came out and thanked the Bondi, Patel and the DoJ for covering up his more heinous crimes within the redactions so no one will ever find them out. The mental hoops Republicans would try to jump through to defend their own and still hate Clinton would be legendary

  15. Of course if Trump tells the DOJ to release them, then they will release them. But Trump would never say that… because of the implication.

  16. If there was anything in Bill, it would’ve come out when Hilary was running in 08 or 16. Or back during her Sec of State days when all we heard about was Bengazi.

  17. “But “selective releases to imply wrongdoing” would confirm “the widespread suspicion” that releases are about “insinuation” implying wrongdoing rather than transparency, Urena said.”

    How about this? trump and his lackeys refuse to comply with this (or any other request) to release the unredacted files.

    Clinton (et al) sue for defamation. It all goes to discovery and Clinton (et al) demand ALL the files.

    Fun fun fun.

Leave A Reply