Share.

44 Comments

  1. stonedhillbillyXX on

    Headline is inaccurate 🤣

    Fucking clown show. He’s gonna rename the country before it’s over

  2. DemocraticFederalist on

    I’m pretty sure Conservatives think you shouldn’t be forced to perform if something violates your beliefs (see Colorado baker case)

  3. Rich_Housing971 on

    You mean the dozens of them that cancelled performances?

    Why are they hurting for money? They got money from Trump, right?

  4. BeowulfShaeffer on

    I gotta think if they do he can start a gofundme and get the money in about twenty minutes. 

  5. FredFuzzypants on

    Great opportunity for artists to band together and do a song to raise money for their defense … “ain’t gonna play Trump’s city”

  6. He agreed to play at the “Kennedy Center” not the “Trump and Kennedy Center”. Open and closed case.

  7. Umami-Ice-Cream on

    If it were backwards, they’d be screeching “free speech!”

    Ignore them. They’ll say whatever they need to. Even if it later contradicts.

  8. Good for them. Let the shiny idiot Trump appointed to lead the board deal with the consequences of glorifying a career criminal and sexual predator.

  9. DarrenEdwardsVR on

    It’s the “Trump” Kennedy center that is threating to sue. The “Kennedy Center” was not based around retribution.

  10. What a pathetic loser Trump is, just sues everybody, how soon until he sues people who didn’t vote for him.

  11. MeasurementSome1463 on

    So they are going to force someone to perform against their beliefs? 

    Can’t wait to make churches support insurance coverage of birth control pills and abortion pills. 

  12. The musician was to perform at the Kennedy Center.

    It’s not called the Kennedy Center anymore. It’s something else now. On top of the fact that anything with that brand, (The name added to it) has a really bad reputation, so expecting someone to perform there now is like asking someone to destroy their own career.

    The performer definitely has legal defense & can counter sue, on top of the fact that if the damn name of the venue changed, then it’s a different venue, so unless that possible name change was seen from the future, & included in the contract, it’s fucking null & void now.

    Plan B? Malicious compliance is likely when you force people to do things they don’t wanna do.

  13. Wow, It is one thing to sue as part of some contractual problem maybe, even though good luck with that. The way this all sounds is so authoritarian speech it seems crazy, did Karoline Leavitt write this?

    “Any artist cancelling their show at the Trump Kennedy Center over political differences isn’t courageous or principled—they are selfish, intolerant, and have failed to meet the basic duty of a public artist: to perform for all people,” she said.

    What if he just doesn’t want his name associated with Trump? Simple as that, should be up to him.

  14. The concert was free. What losses did they encur?

    Also the renaming was illegal. They were asking him to be an accomplice to an illegal act.

  15. justmikebeingmike on

    Lol. “You can’t cancel on us. We cancel on you. How dare you not perform for us because a convicted felon changed the name of a building.”

  16. CountOnBeingAwesome on

    Yup, keep suing your performers. It can only get better. How about apologizing for adding a child rapist’s name to your building?

  17. Prestigious-Car-4877 on

    He booked with the Kennedy center. Where on the contract does it say they can change the venue name to Hitler center?

  18. He probably had a contract. He probably talked to his agent about cancelling. The agent probably told him there would be a penalty for cancelling. And he probably said, “cut the check.”

    Since he wasn’t intimidated by the penalties outlined in the contract, they are now trying get some kind of extra-legal pound of flesh.

Leave A Reply