Share.

28 Comments

  1. Sorry, which side is supposed to be a threat to the American public again?

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard of criminal migrants using chemical agents on American children…

  2. Ok, regardless of the political views, maybe don’t bring your children to a protest where there is a strong chance for some type of violence.

  3. >federal agents decided to respond with violence by releasing tear gas on union members, families, children, and pets”

    this is exactly the bullshit people in power use to break spirits, they throw gas at working people and then call it security. When workers demand dignity and basic rights they get poisons sprayed in their faces. That’s what this is?

  4. 2 protesters have been shot by ICE now, why are parents bringing their kids to a protest when they know how dangerous it can be?

  5. turquoise_amethyst on

    They dumped *chemical munitions* on a very peaceful, very normal crowd of people at 5pm. This was considered the “safe” march that children, babies, and elderly were *walking* in. 

  6. Once you normalize tear-gassing protests, the presence of kids stops being a red line.
    This isn’t about safety. It’s about making dissent expensive and uncomfortable enough that people stop showing up. The wild part is how often this gets framed as “restoring order” instead of “punishing visibility.”

  7. Just to be cruel? They’re only supposed to use that kind of thing when they need to, using it just because you don’t like protests is awful. It could be a fucking KKK protest and if they are not *actively* threatening anything you shouldn’t be using gas on them.

  8. Not trying to be funny, but who the fuck is bringing kids to a potentially volatile protest?

    Get a fucking sitter!

    Go protest, but for god sakes, don’t put your kid in harms way.

  9. Aware-Chipmunk4344 on

    Must sue these agents and the government for the damage and harm, maybe even irreversible , these chemicals do to these childern.

  10. VirtuaFighter6 on

    Animals. Pedophile protectors. November can’t come soon enough. They all need to be impeached.

  11. Dudeus-Maximus on

    Portland Maine?

    If so, how does that not immediately trigger rules of engagement as outlined in title 17A section 108?

    Maine citizens have the legal right to defend themselves and others from law enforcement.

    Why are we not exercising this right vigorously?

Leave A Reply