Share.

39 Comments

  1. Good. Glad to see Boebert caught playing both sides, and outing herself as a leaker to these fucking botnet chuds.

  2. TemporarySun314 on

    considering shes a republican, nothing will happen out of it.

    if anything, then Americans will somehow punish democrats for it…

  3. Don’t tell me the congresswoman that was giving her date a handjob during a showing of Beetlejeuce isn’t following the rules? *shocked face*

  4. These idiots being mad at Hillary while continuing to support the pedo administration is beyond hilarious.

  5. United-Anxiety-5233 on

    I’m so sick of right-wing politicians working directly with russian-funded bloggers. Our country is being attacked by morons named “Benny” ffs

  6. Excellent_Month_2025 on

    That is ridiculous. It’s the Republicans who wanted the doors closed. Clinton should make it open to the public

  7. Select-Belt-ou812 on

    when when when when when will they all start with the unbridled infighting? isn’t it time yet??

  8. That was such a dumbass move. That doesn’t help you whatsoever, why would you do that? Laughably stupid.

  9. So there will be no issues when Trump’s deposition is shared then. He’s the one who’s actually accused of abusing young girls rather than associating with someone who fucked young girls. The difference between the Clintons and the Trumps is massive here. Both families are unpleasant people but Donald is in a different league altogether to Bill.

  10. bitterdivision on

    Clinton adviser Nick Merrill told Politico that the deposition went off the record “while they figure out where the photo came from and why possibly members of Congress are violating House rules.”

    Meanwhile the photo credit is literally right there on twitter where the man says it came from Lauren Boebert. Is this all just a clown show? What do you mean that’s why they went off the record? Sketch.

  11. You mean the party of domestic terrorists and bad faith actors in democracy did something out of the norm or against the rules? Well that doesn’t teach at all for a gang of Russian puppets who actively helped an insurrection.

  12. > “This is the first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein. Clinton does not look happy”.

    No duh, you chodes. Is she supposed to look ecstatic about being dragged here behind closed doors so you can have OAN butcher the deposition until it fits their narrative? Hell, even under normal circumstances, no normal person would be happy about this. But I forgot, it’s a crime in MAGA-land for women to not look nice and happy, but also a crime to look too happy because they might laugh in a way MAGA doesn’t like.

  13. okay, before people go nutz. The article has no leaked photo of Beobert. Beobert leaked a photo to an influencer.

    –MAGA influencer Benny Johnson shared the photo of a stern-looking Clinton on his X account, which he said was “provided by Rep. Lauren Boebert,” and appeared to be taken from the Republican’s seat.

    “The first image of Hillary Clinton testifying under oath about Jeffery Epstein to the Republican Oversight Committee,” Johnson wrote on X, in a post featuring a photo of Clinton. “This is the first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein. Clinton does not look happy.”

    After the post, Clinton adviser Nick Merrill told Politico that the deposition went off the record “while they figure out where the photo came from and why possibly members of Congress are violating House rules.”–

  14. inthedollarbin on

    Amazing that this article just flat out lies in order to say this:

    >Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

  15. GeneralOptimal10 on

    >“If this Committee is serious about learning the truth about Epstein’s trafficking crimes, it would not rely on press gaggles to get answers from our current president on his involvement; it would ask him directly under oath about the tens of thousands of times he shows up in the Epstein files,” Clinton said.

  16. >Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

    Lol, yeah, by his own Department of “Justice”, sure, but like … come on.

    >“If this Committee is serious about learning the truth about Epstein’s trafficking crimes, it would not rely on press gaggles to get answers from our current president on his involvement; it would ask him directly under oath about the tens of thousands of times he shows up in the Epstein files,” Clinton said.

    Just Hillary Clinton being competent and correct as usual.

  17. Prior-Tea-3468 on

    Why does this article end like this? It reads like something which was placed there by Trump himself.

    >Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.

  18. PrimeRibSuspect on

    The article ends with
    > Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution. <

    Trump is mentioned in the files way more than just because he was old pals with Epstein before he had a criminal record. Trump is accused of crimes in them. What kind of dogshit reporting is this.

  19. iHeartCyndiLauper on

    Did anyone else catch that last paragraph?

    “Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.”

    Weird disclaimer, bro.

  20. >Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

    >…

    >Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.

    Yeeeaaaahhhh…… about that…..

    >”Epstein’s lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave,” Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin said. “That was redacted for some indeterminate, inscrutable reason.”

  21. ThenConnection5394 on

    “Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.”

    Yer the fuck he did. “Stop being friends with Epstein”

  22. The article’s author pretends that Trump and Epstein ceased their friendship after JE’s conviction, and that Trump has not been accused of any crimes in the files. Both seem incorrect.

  23. If Boebert is capable of taking a picture and leaking it, someone is capable of recording all of the audio and leaking it as well.

    Get to it. Open the door on this “behind the scenes” bullshit.

  24. I know things always feel bleak and disastrous but it always gives me a little hope knowing that yes these people are the worst and usually evil. But they’re also so unbelievably incompetent that it’s got to blow up sometime

  25. Censure Rep. Lauren Boebert for leaking information from a closed-door congressional meeting to the press. If they are truly transparent, …

  26. OneSeaworthiness7768 on

    >Johnson claimed he was authorized to post the photo and **accused Clinton’s team of trying to “weasel out of answering questions.”**

    Really rich considering she requested to answer questions *publicly* and the GOP would not allow it because they desperately need to control the narrative and spin anything that comes out of it.

  27. Trump is mentioned thousands of times in the Epstein files. Better investigate Hilary! 

    Idiots 

Leave A Reply