>After the post, Clinton adviser Nick Merrill said that the hearing went off the record “while they figure out where the photo came from and why possibly members of Congress are violating House rules.”
We all know Boebert will face no consequences for violating House rules. Think what you will of Hillary Clinton but she isn’t a shrinking violet and has testified ad nauseum over her lifetime. They can’t flap her so they say she doesn’t look happy.
KurtDanglez on
So they derailed the interview they’ve wanted for a decade intentionally? Lol ruh roh
deschain_19195 on
And this is why the hearing should be public
MudBloodLite on
In a normal world, I’d have expected for Boebert to be kicked out.
But then who is gonna give the Republicans sitting next to her handies?
stevenmacarthur on
Same ol’ Bobo: still a jerkoff.
turinturambar on
This trash article contains this as the last line
> Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.
I am unable to register to create a comment under it. But the article is trash, mainly given this last line being stated as a fact, when in fact, the Epstein Files have not been fully released, have been heavily redacted in unjustified ways, and the public is demanding to know all the ways Trump was mentioned, abd what investigation was done into the tips where he is clearly mentioned as being involved. The Independent failed to mention that the DOJ was caught withholding and lying about the Epstein Files, and is currently being considered not a reliable source… at the very least they should mention that they are quoting the DOJ’s line instead of publishing as fact.
A trash article that shields the rich and powerful; a tool for impunity and shamelessness. I’ll remember that The Independent published this.
I405CA on
If they’re going to question this wife of a president, then we can all think of another wife of a president who should also be questioned.
I will bet that Donny knows to whom I am referring, which is why he is not happy about the Clintons being there.
sexeveg314 on
Well at least she wasn’t vaping and giving out handjobs. Baby steps.
TheSilkyBat on
Boebert will just give out handjobs and this will all be forgotten about.
Defiant_Chipmunk2570 on
How much did she get paid?
sugarlessdeathbear on
Senate penalties for this kind of thing go up to expulsion, not sure about the House.
phosdick on
There is a shamefully false statement in this article by *The Independent* which states, without qualification, that…
>Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.
*The Independent* clearly knows that that is simply NOT TRUE…. there are in fact direct, clear accusations in released Trump-Epstein files, with further detail in some [still concealed files, that Trump forced a 13 year old girl to take his mushroom knob into her mouth, then swatted her head when she defended herself](https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell) by biting his disgusting member.
I’d like *The Independent* to publicly and loudly correct this disinformation (i.e., claiming Trump is not accused) as an instance of gross editorial error, else rename itself as *Trump Talking Points*.
Environmental-Arm365 on
I can’t believe Benny Johnson, a guy who was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarizing 60+ articles from other real journalists, would conspire with a congresswomen caught on video giving public handjobs to do such an unethical thing. 😱
iiConTr0v3rSYx on
Banana republic.
mickyfox0 on
They wanted it behind closed doors. So who took the photo with their mobile/ cell phone? So I take it the orange one will be called next?!
Yelloeisok on
Let me guess – she won’t face any consequences whatsoever.
CheesyPotatoSack on
The same Benny that was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarism and found to be bank rolled by Russia …. That influencer?
Containerstorejams on
“Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.”
Are you sure about that?
You sure about that!?
Whornz4 on
She leaked it to a guy who was caught taking Russian bribes.
hapam0de on
At this point, why should Hillary ask for nothing but an open deposition? It’s obvious the GOP can’t control themselves in any situation as seen here by Hoebert. Just reject the subpoenas until not closed door. It’s not like they can arrest her since the GOP dodges those too
Specific_Iron3332 on
Of course it was boobert.
yorapissa on
Given the opportunity, I believe Boebert would have jumped at the chance to be one of Epstein’s girls.
sklerson89 on
Trump raped children
Hmgypsy on
Boebert should be charged.
ChiliSama on
We can’t allow a public hearing like they requested but we’ll allow leaking goofy pics to nut jobs as some kind of “gotcha”. Comer and Jordan are, again, absolute clowns.
Ninja_attack on
Boebert who jerked off her boyfriend in a public setting with children in the theater, who’s son impregnated a minor and keeps getting arrested, and who published her opponents location during J6? She leaked photos against the law? No way, I’m shocked.
27 Comments
Boebert breaks rules. Shocker.
>After the post, Clinton adviser Nick Merrill said that the hearing went off the record “while they figure out where the photo came from and why possibly members of Congress are violating House rules.”
We all know Boebert will face no consequences for violating House rules. Think what you will of Hillary Clinton but she isn’t a shrinking violet and has testified ad nauseum over her lifetime. They can’t flap her so they say she doesn’t look happy.
So they derailed the interview they’ve wanted for a decade intentionally? Lol ruh roh
And this is why the hearing should be public
In a normal world, I’d have expected for Boebert to be kicked out.
But then who is gonna give the Republicans sitting next to her handies?
Same ol’ Bobo: still a jerkoff.
This trash article contains this as the last line
> Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.
I am unable to register to create a comment under it. But the article is trash, mainly given this last line being stated as a fact, when in fact, the Epstein Files have not been fully released, have been heavily redacted in unjustified ways, and the public is demanding to know all the ways Trump was mentioned, abd what investigation was done into the tips where he is clearly mentioned as being involved. The Independent failed to mention that the DOJ was caught withholding and lying about the Epstein Files, and is currently being considered not a reliable source… at the very least they should mention that they are quoting the DOJ’s line instead of publishing as fact.
A trash article that shields the rich and powerful; a tool for impunity and shamelessness. I’ll remember that The Independent published this.
If they’re going to question this wife of a president, then we can all think of another wife of a president who should also be questioned.
I will bet that Donny knows to whom I am referring, which is why he is not happy about the Clintons being there.
Well at least she wasn’t vaping and giving out handjobs. Baby steps.
Boebert will just give out handjobs and this will all be forgotten about.
How much did she get paid?
Senate penalties for this kind of thing go up to expulsion, not sure about the House.
There is a shamefully false statement in this article by *The Independent* which states, without qualification, that…
>Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.
*The Independent* clearly knows that that is simply NOT TRUE…. there are in fact direct, clear accusations in released Trump-Epstein files, with further detail in some [still concealed files, that Trump forced a 13 year old girl to take his mushroom knob into her mouth, then swatted her head when she defended herself](https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell) by biting his disgusting member.
I’d like *The Independent* to publicly and loudly correct this disinformation (i.e., claiming Trump is not accused) as an instance of gross editorial error, else rename itself as *Trump Talking Points*.
I can’t believe Benny Johnson, a guy who was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarizing 60+ articles from other real journalists, would conspire with a congresswomen caught on video giving public handjobs to do such an unethical thing. 😱
Banana republic.
They wanted it behind closed doors. So who took the photo with their mobile/ cell phone? So I take it the orange one will be called next?!
Let me guess – she won’t face any consequences whatsoever.
The same Benny that was fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarism and found to be bank rolled by Russia …. That influencer?
“Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files because he was once friends with Jeffrey Epstein. However, the two stopped being friends long before Epstein was investigated and convicted in Florida of prostitution.”
Are you sure about that?
You sure about that!?
She leaked it to a guy who was caught taking Russian bribes.
At this point, why should Hillary ask for nothing but an open deposition? It’s obvious the GOP can’t control themselves in any situation as seen here by Hoebert. Just reject the subpoenas until not closed door. It’s not like they can arrest her since the GOP dodges those too
Of course it was boobert.
Given the opportunity, I believe Boebert would have jumped at the chance to be one of Epstein’s girls.
Trump raped children
Boebert should be charged.
We can’t allow a public hearing like they requested but we’ll allow leaking goofy pics to nut jobs as some kind of “gotcha”. Comer and Jordan are, again, absolute clowns.
Boebert who jerked off her boyfriend in a public setting with children in the theater, who’s son impregnated a minor and keeps getting arrested, and who published her opponents location during J6? She leaked photos against the law? No way, I’m shocked.