Share.

24 Comments

  1. So, basically, lawyers working for this administration might just be using AI to do their work for them.

  2. silverpotato5955 on

    Sadly they will not be held accountable. Not during this administration at least.

  3. You know you are deep into the decline when even the people paid to care about words stop respecting them. A federal prosecutor does not just make a typo. They sit down, they fabricate quotes, they staple fake authority onto the power of the state and walk it into a courtroom like it is nothing.

    That is not some minor paperwork screwup. That is the government looking a judge in the eye and saying trust me while it waves around lines that were never actually written. Once you cross that line, why should anyone believe a thing that comes stamped with an official seal or wrapped in legal jargon The whole premise of the justice system is that there is at least one room where the truth is supposed to matter more than winning.

    What this really shows is how casual the rot has become. Use AI, invent a quote, shrug when it is exposed, maybe write a memo about better training and move on. If there are no serious consequences for this, then the message to every other lawyer on the ladder is loud and clear. The rules are for suckers. Winning is what counts. And if the people in charge of the law do not respect it, why should anyone else

  4. The judge has got their number.

    So, in this lawsuit we have Judge Numbers and Plaintiff Fivehouse. If the US attorney’s name was Rudy Root, it would’ve been perfect.

  5. No-Advantage5195 on

    Yep it’s just a matter of time until they start using AI for everything im honestly surprised they haven’t already. We are in a dark place for misinformation and this administration will make it a billion times worse.

  6. AI exists to grant skill to those possessing wealth and to deny wealth to those possessing skill.

  7. Sweaty_Lobster_1572 on

    The DOJ exists to prosecute people who lie in legal proceedings. Worth sitting with that for a second.

  8. INFO: Fabricated as in…

    1. that they just made stuff of, or…

    2, fabricated in that they were so lazy that they used AI hallucinations?

  9. Calm_Chemist_4952 on

    Another example of the rapid decline of US DOJ. No excuses. This is really bad lawyering. A lawyer’s signature on a filing is a representation that the authorities cited are true an accurate. In this situation that representation was false. The judge should be justified in issuing a very stern sanction. Moreover, the lawyer, who is supposed to be an officer of the court, has broken a bond of trust with the judge. Bottom line, US DOJ can’t be trusted.

  10. SoundSageWisdom on

    It’s time for people to start to lose their law license and for people to be sanctioned

  11. lostsailorlivefree on

    These poor judges. Must be like swimming in a legal cess pool having to read and comprehend their filings- then talk to them in Court.

  12. I’m not a law-talking guy, but I’m pretty sure making stuff up in legal filings is frowned upon. In fact, I know it is because I had an assistant manager at a restaurant who was disbarred for fabricating shit. He would play it off like he was some sort of maverick and used to say “I got away with so much bullshit”. Yeah, until you were caught, fined, disgraced, and booted from the profession.

  13. joshuabrogers on

    This is why Pam Bondi wants to take over state bar investigations into DOJ attorneys. They absolutely be trusted to investigate themselves 🤯

Leave A Reply