Share.

48 Comments

  1. BulwarkOnline on

    Steyer is no dummy: While a Washington Post poll last fall found that 75 percent of Democratic voters and 60 percent of independents thought spending by billionaires on political campaigns is either bad or very bad, those voters also overwhelmingly oppose ICE, and Steyer has worked hard to position himself as the anti-ICE candidate.

  2. The Bulwark is a never trump Tory magazine, so when they say “forget abolish ice” you must remember these are people who would vote for Jeb Bush.

  3. Prior_Coyote_4376 on

    There’s not a chance he actually follows through.

    He’s doing the Blue Trump populist routine where he claims he’s going to be a wrecking ball against an establishment people are tired of with these slogans. This is his “lock them up” line. He tried to copy Trump in tariffs by threatening to tax software USAGE. Yes, a software consumption tax.

    The retired hedge fund manager and megadonor who made billions off of private prisons that contracted with ICE and Israel, who invested in coal mine projects emitting carbon increasingly through 2030, whose community bank trapped low-income families with 25%+ interest rates on predatory loans, who pressured Yale to get his hedge fund rolling even after students objected, who said “I honestly don’t know what genocide means”, who has now spent over $500m of his own money bankrolling his ad campaigns over the last decade (and STILL TAKES DONATIONS)…

    is not the change agent. He is as swampy as the other oligarchs demanding we give them executive power. He has even given to other candidates in his own race who then drop out and endorse him after wasting everyone’s time holding down a few percent.

    Steyer is very dangerously close to being a Fetterman as governor of California.

    Also, he’s going to cross the age of 70 in office. He’s already having stumbles, confused moments, and a really tired demeanor at the last debate.

  4. They murdered people. This isn’t radical, it’s the bare minimum – when you murder someone on camera with multiple witnesses you get fucking arrested and tried. The people who murdered Renee Good and Alex Pretti should have been arrested by the state police immediately.

    I would love to have a single person in power to actually give a shit about this beyond rhetoric.

  5. Until laws are enforced on the ruling class, laws mean nothing but a threat of violence towards the have nots. 

  6. BoredCrusader1899 on

    I want another option instead. It’s a little messy and will probably get me on a watchlist if I say it but it’s something that I believe every ICE agent rightfully deserves.

  7. One-Anteater-4771 on

    I’m basically a single issue voter at this point and that issue is prosecuting ICE and the Trump administration. Everything else can come after that.

  8. pleachchapel on

    This dude’s platform lines up with my policy goals completely, but something is off about it coming from a billionaire. I feel like we’re being bamboozled, & it’ll seem really obvious later if he turns heel.

  9. Billionaire
    Invested in private prisons – this guy is a the Fetterman of California.

    Xavier Becerra is a better candidate.

  10. I don’t see why we’re splitting hairs over one or the other. Doing both is entirely plausible and frankly appropriate.

  11. Any who committed a crime should be jailed. A blanket judgement is not any better than what they’re doing

  12. Be neat if the agents that murdered US citizens on US soil during immigration crackdowns faced accountability for murdering citizens.

    That would be a good start. And then arrest those who helped hide them from accountability.

  13. Abolish ICE to stop the crimes, and prosecute the crimes that have been committed already. We can do both.

  14. sloowshooter on

    I call BS on that. Steyer is just leveraging the public’s despise for ICE to gain votes. As Guv he has zero impact on federal impropriety/law breaking nationwide. 

    He might as well promise public beheadings. 

    What is the real deal here is that he is trying make a show of cleaning house to KEEP ICE GOING as he profits from that system. Those prisons aren’t to fill themselves. I can only predict that no matter how far he tries to distance himself from his past investments, in the future there is nothing from stopping him from investing in exactly the same type of facilities again.

  15. Do we actually believe Ton Steyer (the billionaire) is actually going to follow through on this? This feels like Bloomberg 2.0 all over again…

  16. All of them belong in prison. Zero exceptions. We’re not going to fix this country until we put the trash where it belongs.

Leave A Reply