Share.

13 Comments

  1. Well_this_is_akward on

    “Local councils in the UK directly accommodate over 176,000 children and their families when they became homeless”

  2. Fatty-McFatto on

    Without numerous feral children, the paedophile industry in England would collapse

  3. old_chelmsfordian on

    Will they have to take the lasagne out before putting the kids in?

  4. I’m sure if they came over on a boat they’d be given everything they need.

  5. Separate_Muffin_9431 on

    I wonder how I’m struggling to live, working to lose almost half my salary to fund accommodation for people not working.

  6. smudgethomas on

    Yeah this is what happens when you keep having more migrants and refuse to build houses.

  7. prettybunbun on

    Only in the UK can you have people in the comments moaning about & complaining about paying tax towards … homeless children.

  8. vaguelypurple on

    It’s okay we’re spending millions on banning them from the internet to save them. We care about children, see!

  9. Luckily, councils own housing stock that can be used to accommodate these children & their families. It’s not like they’ve been forced to sell them off for below market rate for decades & not been allowed to replenish social housing stock because the free market knows best!

    Indeed this free market is so good local authorities have spent vast sums on paying lordlords who own former council houses.

    Most certainly, this coupled with diabolical planning regulations & utter inaction to sort leasehold, *definitely* hasn’t lead to housing become a major asset class that would end badly if prices were to drop. /s

    Which has opened up some absolutely perverse incentives for current homeowners to financially benefit form **LITERAL CHILDREN NOT HAVING A ROOF OVER THEIR HEAD!!!**

Leave A Reply