Share.

22 Comments

  1. It means North Korea updated their Constitution to automatically launch a nuclear strike if Kim Jong-Un is assassinated.

  2. JoseLunaArts on

    Let me make a list of recent decapitation strikes:

    * Soleimani
    * Nasrallah
    * Ali Khamenei
    * Ali Larijani
    * Kamal Kharrazi (wounded)
    * Putin (failed strike against his home in Novgorod, requires satellite intelligence)
    * Maduro (captured)

    Just wondering who could be the authors of these attacks.

    ![gif](giphy|3oFzmerJ9kykSR92jm)

  3. Why would his subordinates be motivated to open themselves to nuclear retaliation if he’s already dead?

  4. WilcoHistBuff on

    So what if he is assassinated by family member to take control of the country? Do they nuke themselves?

  5. … and if this happens internally, by military coup, or political element within their sham congress? Who do they launch against then?

  6. DavyJonesCousinsDog on

    It means his government and/or apparatus unearthed evidence of a prospective assassination attempt by low ranking members of his government and/or military.

    This was, however, connected to *high* ranking members of his government and/or military. These individuals, therefore, spun an elaborate tale of how [insert foreign power here] had planted agents in the government and/or military to assassinate him – thus freeing them from suspicion.

    In large part this is believable because the Western Worlds most erratic pedophile has repeatedly greenlit military operations in or around North Korea – not all of which have gone brilliantly. It’s not *that* hard a sell to suggest that rather than his good, loyal, friendly, and did I mention loyal officers and ministers who are totally not the ones behind this it’s the shouting, lecherous hot dog across the sea again

  7. The US wasn’t going to assassinate him, even before this new “law”. Kim Jong Un is a known quantity. But his potential successor is an unknown.

    Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t

Leave A Reply