Share.

25 Comments

  1. Even_Trifle9341 on

    Those senators without a wealthy benefactor paying for them to be there are going to be pretty upset.

  2. Straight-Ad6926 on

    Does this include their lobbyists consulting fees or are we just talking about the official salary they barely notice anyway?

  3. Main-Bandicoot6477 on

    I mean, this would just hurt the relatively few not wealthy senators. And it puts unequal pressure on Senators to do something based purely on their own needs. The really rich Senators won’t feel the presure at all.

    73 of 100 have a net worth over $1 million.

    This just seems more preformative than anything else.

  4. SedativeComet on

    Makes no difference as long as they can take out interest in stock trading.

  5. FrankAdamGabe on

    This only hurts those who don’t take the bribes.

    Make it so no stock trades can be done or campaign contributions made and then it’ll actually hurt.

  6. They’re only trolling us. No way in Hell this passes. I do agree with the bill tho.

  7. Za_Lords_Guard on

    Let’s kick it a nickel. How about for every day they fail to fund the government not only do they not get paid, each one gets fined like $1K and that money goes to the pay the debt. Won’t do much, but as they always say about taxes… If you don’t have skin in the game your aren’t properly motivated.

    Fail the people; pay the people.

  8. PleasantWay7 on

    How about instead of stupid bills like this, you just pass a bill that says “Government services cannot shutdown automatically and continues funding at existing level unless explicitly modified by Congress.”

  9. elconquistador1985 on

    Isn’t that unconstitutional? Or at least doesn’t apply until the next Congress?

    I thought the legislature couldn’t change their own salaries, but only future ones.

  10. spewing_honey_badger on

    This, like most of the GOP efforts, feels like it will disproportionately affect the least wealthy in congress.

    Sigh.

  11. WhatAcheHunt on

    This is counterintuitive as it is a huge deterrent for politicians who *don’t* use their public position for personal financial gain. This is because the politicians who are stuffing their pockets in backroom deals are the ones who will have the insulation stay afloat during a shutdown, whereas the politicians who would otherwise survive on that paycheck will be thoroughly punished. This would be a huge deterrent for regular folks who want to represent their districts knowing that they will likely go without pay for an indeterminable length of time at *some* point during their tenure.

    A better solution would be triggering recalls or special elections to replace representatives when there is an impasse on government funding. What is the point of converting an overflowing toilet to spa for rich assholes when there is literally a plunger in our hand.

  12. snack__pack on

    It’s a no brainer, deserves no commendation. Wouldn’t be passed if they weren’t all already very financial secure. 

  13. alabasterskim on

    Unconstitutional. Pay for members of Congress is enshrined in the Constitution. It’s also a shitty policy in general for the Senators that aren’t there just to enrich themselves.

  14. westergames81 on

    How about we just make them stay in session until they figure this shit out?

    They need to be in chambers for 8 hours a day, every day, until they do something. Go ahead and pay them, I don’t care since that’s not where they get their money from anyways, but make them be present. I’d love a feed of them just sitting in chambers playing on their phone while government employees starve.

  15. Cold_Specialist_3656 on

    This is not a good move. 

    It hurts Senators who don’t take corporate money and stand up for their constituents. Corrupt corporate stooges get their money from bribes, this won’t affect them at all. 

    In fact, this is likely to be wielded as a political weapon against those who don’t take corporate money. That might even be the entire reason it’s being proposed. To force a dependence on oligarch money. 

  16. How about snap elections if they don’t pass a budget? That might actually affect these fuckers.

  17. GreenDavidA on

    People who advocate for these things truly do not understand the socioeconomic background of our leaders.

  18. Free-Environment-571 on

    Most senators are so wealthy they won’t even notice if they don’t get paid

Leave A Reply