Share.

28 Comments

  1. Al_Tilly_the_Bum on

    I mean, it is just going to say what we already know

    1. Biden should not have run at all and we should have had a real primary

    2. Harris should have tried to distance herself from Biden

    3. Harris should have campaigned more to progressives instead of assuming their vote and trying to win over republicans with Liz Cheney

    4. The DNC and Harris should have been tougher on Israel instead of supporting a genocide.

    What did I miss?

  2. Uhhh_what555476384 on

    As someone that has done door to door campaigning in purple districts:

    Probably because it says something like “the current coalition doesn’t work out mathematically without a severe change of course on one or more social issues.”

  3. OnwardTowardTheNorth on

    Because the establishment is a corporate captured entity that is listening to their rich donors rather than to their voters.

  4. WhichAd7747 on

    [PODS interview](https://youtu.be/h8IwrO-03WU?si=9bLI5rnV1CNuCzbz)

    We don’t want to release the ‘free’ 200+ page autopsy on 2024 because we want to focus on winning going forward.

    Like the Epstein files, there is no smoking gun – nothing to see here.

    We want to just focus on operationalizing lessons which we don’t want to reveal.

    We would rather not face the music and be transparent with our voters because it’s not them we serve, care, fight or have regard for. It’s about our donors and their interests that we care for.

    🤦‍♂️

    Zohran, in the run up to nyc mayor, actually went on the street and talked to working class New Yorkers to find out [why so many of them voted for Trump](https://youtu.be/K7FcVCYqQNs?si=MCCOLfpIn3TdjvGC).

  5. MarcusQuintus on

    There is no autopsy. The people managing it were in over their heads, they didn’t interview anyone, they didn’t do any serious investigating.

    And Ken Martin isn’t a good enough leader to be open and honest and state that.

  6. -Random_Lurker- on

    Because it would tell them to change what they were doing and they can’t stand that.

  7. Their candidate dropped out after the primary and incumbents all over the world lost in that cycle because they took the blame for world wide inflation. I doubt an autopsy would be useful given how unusual the election cycle ended up being.

  8. Sea_Damage9357 on

    “We have investigated ourselves and found no mistakes or wrongdoing.”

  9. PriestofAlvis on

    They want donor money and so can’t admit the party is broken and nonviable in our current circumstances. There is a leak in the boat and they would rather let us all drown than admit it.

  10. Somebody with courage should leak the report. Oh wait, this is the Democratic Party

  11. ADrenalineDiet on

    One of two reasons:

    Either the autopsy is so incompetently done that releasing it would be an absolute embarrassment

    or

    The autopsy blames strategies and partnerships the DNC refuses to change

  12. weren’t only like two autopsies released in all of american history or something like that? This isn’t new and thus doesn’t necessarily mean something is being hidden

  13. Does this article really say that polls have Kamala as the frontrunner nominee in 2028? Never seen a better reason to ignore polls.

  14. Wise-Promise-4158 on

    Because it’ll confirm what we already know about Israel and dem establishment continues to wish to be in denial

  15. NotTheRightHDMIPort on

    Im going to post my thoughts from a different thread: All signs point less to a single bad strategic decision and more to systemic problems within the Democratic consulting and campaign infrastructure itself.

    The issue isn’t just “they picked the wrong message” or “they spent too much on TV.” Parties can learn from normal mistakes.

    The deeper concern is whether the DNC outsourced major parts of the campaign to consultants and firms whose incentives weren’t fully aligned with winning, but with protecting internal networks, donor relationships, ideological factions, or simply maintaining their own relevance and revenue streams.

    At that point, the problem stops being tactical failure and starts looking like institutional self-interest overriding electoral effectiveness.

    Or bluntly: The suspicion isn’t just incompetence. It’s that parts of the consultant class may have been optimizing for influence, contracts, factional priorities, and access rather than maximizing the odds of victory.

    The DNC can completely rework its consultant and donor ecosystem without publicly releasing the autopsy at all, because admitting the real problem may simply be too embarrassing. Saying “we lost because the polling, advice, and overall strategy we relied on were fundamentally counterproductive, and leadership listened anyway” would infuriate donors, activists, and voters alike, because it turns the failure from a few bad decisions into a deeper indictment of the party’s entire political infrastructure.

  16. Practical_Junket_464 on

    Perhaps political strategy why would they release information on how they failed ? How would that benifit them?

  17. AverageJoeJohnSmith on

    Bc they plan on ignoring the results of it. we all know that but they don’t want to outright admit it. 

  18. Because they’re all owned by the billionaires and donors. Fuck the lot of em

  19. Maybe they are finally learning that if you don’t tell your weakness then the opposition can’t exploit it.

  20. because it will confirm that they lost voters due to lack of material change for americans and supporting a genocide. issues that the party loyalists pretend arent issues that need to be addressed. party leaders who think democrats need to be transphobic imperialist capitalist borderhawks.

Leave A Reply