Share.

24 Comments

  1. Indiscriminate bombing, the warheads just fall where they may. Which means they aren’t even maintaining the pretense that they’re striking military targets exclusively, but shed crocodile tears when they hide a military academy inside a “school” and they lose *actual* cadets.

  2. I’m not familiar with the Kyiv region.

    Is there a maternity clinic in Bila Tserkva?

  3. MoneyDirt8888 on

    I am a peaceful human being but when I see this kind of stuff I have sudendly a vague idea to kill people from Ruzzia as much as possible.

  4. Now the question is: did they only fired one or did they tried to launch 2 but the other one failed and fell back on its TEL?

  5. This kind of stuff just screams how impotent Russia really is. Modern day Nazi V2 little dick energy.

  6. Why did you remove the sound?

    No detonations, just falling debris.

    Also flash looks like Patriot interception.

  7. the-coolest-bob on

    I was speaking truth when I said Tulsi Gabbard deserves cancer. She supports this

  8. lilian_moraru on

    As Ukrainians say “are we supposed to be afraid? They attack us every day anyway, Oreshnik or not”.
    Iskander can already do what this is supposed to do – they already have this capability, and they have been throwing Iskander missiles at them for years.

  9. Rrrrrrrrrryy on

    What’s with the lack of warheads in the mirv? I’m not expecting nukes but I’m also not expecting blanks? What was the friggin point?

  10. SaucyFagottini on

    I’d really like to know what these either hit or were supposed to hit. I’m sure Russian sources will tell us shortly the entire NATO command was taken out in a Kyiv bunker along with several gay meth addicted prostitutes, but otherwise this is 10’s of millions on nothing.

  11. CheekyMenace on

    I’m really curious to see where these things hit, and how much damage they cause even without warheads.

  12. entropyweasel on

    Did anyone expect Russia to not be a sore loser?

    This is painful to see but if their escalation option is to chuck absurdly expensive missiles at Kyiv from far away the end is near.

    At the start of the war it was spetsnaz, helos, and navy assets when they wanted to make an extra point.

    Those capabilities are now a joke.

    During the middle of the war it was massive artillery forces and mass grinding assaults when leadership really wanted something bad.

    Now it’s… Whatever this is.

    I wasn’t sure that it was the end game for Russia but this convinced me.

    This screams “sure, what do we have to lose at this point” decision energy if this was their choice.

  13. Bila Tserkva isn’t some random town it’s a city of 200,000 about 80km south of Kyiv, with significant industrial infrastructure and transportation nodes. If this is actually Oreshnik, it’s only the third or fourth confirmed use since the Dnipro strike in late November. Russia’s been holding it back for high-profile targets, which makes the choice of Bila Tserkva worth noting.

    The footage does show the characteristic MIRV separation pattern, but the actual targeting accuracy of Oreshnik once those warheads separate has been questionable in previous strikes. We tracked the Dnipro impact at panopsik.com when it happened the strike was more symbolic than precise. Same pattern seems to apply here: meant to signal capability rather than achieve specific military effect.

    What industrial or logistics sites are in Bila Tserkva that would justify burning an Oreshnik on it? Genuinely asking if anyone’s got ground knowledge of what’s actually there, that would clarify whether this was aimed at infrastructure or just meant to rattle windows closer to Kyiv.

Leave A Reply