20% of people worldwide are disabled in some way. Most disabilities, if caught and managed early, can be worked around decently well in adult life.
So, it isn’t too surprising theyre finding kids that are disabled. And it’s good they’re receiving help.
spaghettibolegdeh on
Over 1 in 4 seems pretty wild to me.
Is this including learning difficulties? Perhaps the term “disability” makes this harder to believe due to historic usage.
knobbledknees on
This is the kind of number that, in isolation, makes people clutch their pearls. But a lot of these are very small adjustments, the same kind you might get if you break a finger before an exam (rest breaks, use of a computer). Some of them are things as simple as having fewer distracting things on a wall in front of certain students so they can focus more.
If a teacher knows that a student struggles with auditory processing, or visual processing, then they can adjust how they deliver information. The student will be more focused since they can actually access the material; this also means they are less likely to disturb the rest of the class, meaning everybody benefits.
Also, when we see that this is something increasing globally as we start to look more for people with less obvious disabilities, we can see that this is not something “caused” by our own Australian government policies.
In the past, for example, we tended only to diagnose people with autism if it was accompanied by an intellectual disability. This is quite a small number of people, but there are many more people who have some degree of autism, who will struggle more than others, but also might be very hyper performing in some areas. These people often just used to get bullied or regarded as strange, and no adjustments were made for things that made them perform less well than they could have.
Another one is ADHD; it used to be that only those children with a high level of hyperactivity got diagnosed. Even then, a lot of children just got classified as naughty or disruptive, as still happens today. Those with inattentive ADHD were called lazy or unmotivated or disorganised, and usually thought that about themselves, without any awareness that the reason they could not organise a study plan or remain focused in class was because of their brain chemistry. Diagnosing these people early can really help with their achievement in school, but also with their emotional development, since they are less likely to spend half their lives blaming themselves for underperforming. This is especially a big problem because of how ADHD contributes to emotional dysregulation, leading to excessive self blame.
The only downside that any of this increased diagnosis MIGHT have(I stress the ‘might’ deliberately) is if some people learn to blame their diagnosis and so don’t develop the skills that some people in earlier generations were forced to develop. But this is a matter of education, and hiding a diagnosis does not help. And importantly, it is really easy to romanticise older generations and imagine that we (I am one of those older generations) all learned great adaptations because we had things harder. One of my pet theories, although I have no idea how to test it, is that the decline of alcohol use and alcoholism amongst younger people is partly due to the fact that they are diagnosed and then treated earlier, and better, for various issues; one of the adaptations that many people in earlier generations learnt as a way to deal with their issues, whether a disability or trauma, was just to self-medicate by consuming a lot of booze. It’s very noticeable how many adults who are diagnosed with ADHD, and medicated, overcome alcohol use issues as a result. Not all, but for some it’s night and day – I was talking to a psychiatrist recently who told me about a client who went from multiple bottles of wine every day to a few drinks a week after being on Vyvanse. She said that this was just a more extreme example of a progression she sees a lot.
So overall, the number in a headline is deliberately designed to provoke a reaction, but it should not be surprising, and it is beneficial for society as a whole that people are getting better help, both in schools and in life.
MyMudEye on
A lot of adults are just finding out they have been dealing with autism and adhd all their lives.
Imagine finding out your life didn’t have to be so hard if you had the right medication and social support provided earlier on.
When the WA gov did an audit of its juvenile corrections facilitate a few years ago, the majority of inmates had mental health issues, including alcohol fetal syndrome.
Imagine if those kids had been diagnosed and treated and given support.
I’m sure the adult corrections facilities are ready and waiting for them.
PLUTO_HAS_COME_BACK on
Why doesn’t childhood vaccination prevent this?
nobodyimportant1377 on
Because… Because people are paying attention? I don’t look ‘autistic’ at first glance, but without any of the modifications made for me by my school? I would’ve been crushed long ago. Disability is becoming less taboo and our professionals are learning how to properly identify it without the stigma and bias, so why is that a bad thing?
7 Comments
Because we are looking
I’m not sure its that much more complicated
20% of people worldwide are disabled in some way. Most disabilities, if caught and managed early, can be worked around decently well in adult life.
So, it isn’t too surprising theyre finding kids that are disabled. And it’s good they’re receiving help.
Over 1 in 4 seems pretty wild to me.
Is this including learning difficulties? Perhaps the term “disability” makes this harder to believe due to historic usage.
This is the kind of number that, in isolation, makes people clutch their pearls. But a lot of these are very small adjustments, the same kind you might get if you break a finger before an exam (rest breaks, use of a computer). Some of them are things as simple as having fewer distracting things on a wall in front of certain students so they can focus more.
If a teacher knows that a student struggles with auditory processing, or visual processing, then they can adjust how they deliver information. The student will be more focused since they can actually access the material; this also means they are less likely to disturb the rest of the class, meaning everybody benefits.
Also, when we see that this is something increasing globally as we start to look more for people with less obvious disabilities, we can see that this is not something “caused” by our own Australian government policies.
In the past, for example, we tended only to diagnose people with autism if it was accompanied by an intellectual disability. This is quite a small number of people, but there are many more people who have some degree of autism, who will struggle more than others, but also might be very hyper performing in some areas. These people often just used to get bullied or regarded as strange, and no adjustments were made for things that made them perform less well than they could have.
Another one is ADHD; it used to be that only those children with a high level of hyperactivity got diagnosed. Even then, a lot of children just got classified as naughty or disruptive, as still happens today. Those with inattentive ADHD were called lazy or unmotivated or disorganised, and usually thought that about themselves, without any awareness that the reason they could not organise a study plan or remain focused in class was because of their brain chemistry. Diagnosing these people early can really help with their achievement in school, but also with their emotional development, since they are less likely to spend half their lives blaming themselves for underperforming. This is especially a big problem because of how ADHD contributes to emotional dysregulation, leading to excessive self blame.
The only downside that any of this increased diagnosis MIGHT have(I stress the ‘might’ deliberately) is if some people learn to blame their diagnosis and so don’t develop the skills that some people in earlier generations were forced to develop. But this is a matter of education, and hiding a diagnosis does not help. And importantly, it is really easy to romanticise older generations and imagine that we (I am one of those older generations) all learned great adaptations because we had things harder. One of my pet theories, although I have no idea how to test it, is that the decline of alcohol use and alcoholism amongst younger people is partly due to the fact that they are diagnosed and then treated earlier, and better, for various issues; one of the adaptations that many people in earlier generations learnt as a way to deal with their issues, whether a disability or trauma, was just to self-medicate by consuming a lot of booze. It’s very noticeable how many adults who are diagnosed with ADHD, and medicated, overcome alcohol use issues as a result. Not all, but for some it’s night and day – I was talking to a psychiatrist recently who told me about a client who went from multiple bottles of wine every day to a few drinks a week after being on Vyvanse. She said that this was just a more extreme example of a progression she sees a lot.
So overall, the number in a headline is deliberately designed to provoke a reaction, but it should not be surprising, and it is beneficial for society as a whole that people are getting better help, both in schools and in life.
A lot of adults are just finding out they have been dealing with autism and adhd all their lives.
Imagine finding out your life didn’t have to be so hard if you had the right medication and social support provided earlier on.
When the WA gov did an audit of its juvenile corrections facilitate a few years ago, the majority of inmates had mental health issues, including alcohol fetal syndrome.
Imagine if those kids had been diagnosed and treated and given support.
I’m sure the adult corrections facilities are ready and waiting for them.
Why doesn’t childhood vaccination prevent this?
Because… Because people are paying attention? I don’t look ‘autistic’ at first glance, but without any of the modifications made for me by my school? I would’ve been crushed long ago. Disability is becoming less taboo and our professionals are learning how to properly identify it without the stigma and bias, so why is that a bad thing?