Share.

30 Comments

  1. Unfortunately every western nation needs to boycott all American military hardware.

  2. Canadian here. People are very scared of the instability. In the past 3 elections the trump rhetoric has won twice and almost won once. That’s 10 years and the last 2 years are out of control. We have got to diversify our trading partners because the voters that elected trump aren’t going anywhere after he leaves.

  3. YourShowerCompanion on

    Dispaer Donnie, Couch rapist, Dumb McNamara & MAGA Inc. are going to throw tantrums.

  4. StickaFORKinMyEye on

    Canada is also looking to replace their submarines and they’ve been talking to Germany and South Korea. 

    I’m in a border city and we share our public radio with Toronto (BTPM). It’s fascinating to hear how Canada is very actively moving away from the US on my drive into work. Multiple them with the other allies we’re driving away and the US is going to be a poorer nation over time.

  5. PoliticalSasquatch on

    Beyond the general instability of dealing with the current US administration there are a couple key reasons for this.

    The main factor is the base plane is made in Canada by bombardier so this directly supports our aerospace and defence industries as well as interoperability with Sweden and other Nordic allies.

    The other is the US’ sudden pivot away from their own replacement AWACs in favour of satellite tracking via the golden dome. Creates uncertainty around parts and longevity of the platform despite a few other allies purchasing it.

    A wise choice moving forward I think.

  6. Exotic-Ferret-3452 on

    Hope Sweden provides plenty of extra S-shaped Allen keys for assembling those jets

  7. When your closest neighbor and historical best friend starts viewing you as an unpredictable geopolitical risk instead of a reliable partner, you’ve officially failed the room.

  8. Good. It’s based on a Canadian Bombardier platform and helps keep the defense industry less concentrated.

  9. mfhandy5319 on

    I’d be fearful of buying a $100M jet fighter only to find out that radar is now a subscription service for $1M a month.

  10. gelatineous on

    A key consideration for states when dealing with the US is reliability. Everything, up to standing deals about security arrangements, becomes a bargaining chip. The UK is keenly aware of this, and so are we.

  11. Bishopjones2112 on

    That’s a weird way of putting it. How about this, Canada decided to choose an early warning aircraft from a supplier who is reliable and doesn’t threaten national sovereignty. That makes more sense right. Sounds more in line with reality.

  12. SAAB is going to build 1/3 of the fleet in Canada.

    Why choose planes that are totally built in America?

  13. michaelfkenedy on

    For the Saab GlobalEye, not the Gripen, for anyone wanting to save a click.

    The fighter decision is still out there.

  14. This is kind of a non-story. The Saab product is an electronics suite that goes on top of a Canadian-manufactured bizjet, so in essence, it’s “Canada buys Canadian airplanes with Swedish radar bolted onto them”.

  15. It’s actually a Canadian made aircraft (Bombardier) with Saab’s mission package. So it makes 100% sense for Canada to support it’s own aerospace industry. Given that Canada is already buying 14 (+2 option) Boeing P-8 aircraft, the Boeing E-7 Wedgetail would’ve been overkill. The L3Harris platform was a non-starter.

  16. The US still hasn’t decided on production of the E-7, so realistically, the Globaleye is the only show in town anyway. This decision was more practicality based rather than political. The RAF are having a nightmare converting 737s to E-7s with cost overruns. Unless the US had announced firm orders for the E-7 that could be piggy backed on, no one would have picked it, unless they have deep pockets.

  17. obi_wan_peirogi on

    The aircraft are bombardier… canadian… the tech it will be outfitted with is swedish (saab)

Leave A Reply